Laserfiche WebLink
The City still has not accommodated the RI-1NA allocated to it in 200L <br /> The City's enactment of Ordinance 1998 a month and a half before the <br /> hearing on this petition may start a process to cure the City's failure in this matter, <br /> but is wholly inadequate to be considered a cure. Its requirement of further <br /> necessary acts before any development plan can be approved vitiates any actual <br /> remedial effect of the Ordinance. Moreover, the "good cause" exception in the <br /> Ordinance is illusory because it is not defined and bccause it is an obvious <br /> disincentive to developers. The requirement that a developer might have to spend <br /> a great deal of money just to reach the point where a discretionary determination of <br /> whether "good cause" exists to allow a developer to continue with a project will <br /> inhibit any developer from proposing any residential development. <br /> For the above stated reasons, the Writ of Mandate is GRANTED. <br /> Respondents City of Pleasanton and City Council of the City of Pleasanton <br /> must cease and desist from the enforcement; administration, and/or implementation <br /> of the provisions of Measures GG, PP, and QQ, which limit the number of housing <br /> units permitted in Pleasanton, and must remove those provisions from all of <br /> Pleasanton's planning documents including the General Plan and any element of <br /> the General Plan. This includes Policy 24 and Programs 24.1, 24.2, and 24.3 of the <br /> Land Use Element of the General Plan. <br /> Respondents must implement non illusory zoning changes sufficient to <br /> accommodate the unmet RHNA for the 1999 -2007 Planning Period. That is, the zoning <br /> 8 <br />