My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
042010
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2010 1:26:37 PM
Creation date
4/15/2010 11:27:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/20/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Sullivan noted the Elections Code directly reinforces the language of the <br /> Referendum Petition in that it allows the Council to either repeal the ordinance or submit it to the <br /> voters. <br /> Councilmember McGovern asked if Ms. Seto could recall any referendums where the Council <br /> has not allowed rebuttal arguments. Ms. Seto said she has not been present for any referendum <br /> in the City. Mr. Fialho stated that at least the last two carried rebuttals. <br /> Mayor Hosterman opened the item for public comment. <br /> Carolyn Newton asked the Council to heed the passage of Measure PP in 2008, and vote to <br /> repeal the ordinance. <br /> Allen Roberts urged the Council to rescind its vote and ask the developer to return with a plan <br /> consistent with Measure PP. He asked that if the Council should choose to submit the matter to <br /> the voters, that it clarify the costs associated with a June versus November election. <br /> Kay Ayala encouraged the Council to rescind Ordinance No. 1961, and if not set November as <br /> the election date and to consider as the ballot question "Shall the development plan for the Oak <br /> Grove property in the City's southeast hills be approved <br /> Councilmember Sullivan asked her thoughts on who should draft the ballot arguments. Ms. <br /> Ayala said there are numerous people who would like to participate in drafting the argument for <br /> the referendum as well as rebuttals, and that they would like the Council to join them in that <br /> effort. <br /> Richard Pugh spoke in favor of repealing Ordinance No. 1961. <br /> Margo Tarver asked Council to considering repelling its approval of Ordinance No. 1961. <br /> Lee Fulton said that if this issue is put to the voters, it should be on the November ballot to <br /> ensure maximum public participation. <br /> Kelly Cousins asked the Council to rescind the project as proposed or if not, to place it on the <br /> November ballot. <br /> Paul Martens stated the project calls for the relocation of 750,000 cubic yards of dirt. He asked <br /> council to revisit the issue of campaign contributions from business enterprises seeking project <br /> approval within the City and for the Councilmembers who have received contributions from Oak <br /> Grove developers or their associates to recuse themselves from this item. <br /> Mayor Hosterman stated the data provided by Mr. Martens is only a small percentage of all <br /> campaign monies received and she invited the public to view the full campaign report online via <br /> the City's website. <br /> Karen DeBaca Martens questioned the fairness of actions by owners and developers of Oak <br /> Grove, particularly as they relate to campaign contributions. She asked that Mayor Hosterman <br /> and Vice -Mayor Thorne return all campaign contributions received from Mr. Tong. <br /> Karla Brown said when the Council majority voted in favor of the project, it did not have the <br /> same information it has now that the citizens want hillside protection. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 5 of 15 February 16, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.