My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
040610
>
17 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2010 1:29:22 PM
Creation date
4/1/2010 12:20:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/6/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
17 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. COST -OF- SERVICE ANALYSIS <br /> Cost -of- service analysis is a rate making technique that is used to derive reasonable <br /> rates. Reasonable rates are defined by the courts as not being capricious, arbitrary, or <br /> discriminatory. Rates are not capricious if there is a clear rationale supporting the <br /> analysis. Rates are not arbitrary if there is a sound basis for choosing among <br /> alternatives. Finally, rates are not discriminatory if they allocate costs proportionately. <br /> The City's rates have been designed consistent with cost -of- service principles. <br /> The cost -of- service analysis applies to both the City's service and consumption charges. <br /> Each of these charges should generate an amount of revenue that is appropriate to the <br /> City's rate making objectives. As previously explained, service charges apply to each <br /> customer regardless of the customers class. In the case of the consumption charges, <br /> however, the rates are different for each customer class. As a result, the cost -of- service <br /> analysis is used to determine the amount of revenue that should be generated by each <br /> customer class' consumption charges. <br /> 3.1. REVENUE COMPONENTS <br /> Figure 3 -1 summarizes the major sources of City revenue projected for FY 2010 -11. The <br /> cost -of- service analysis is concerned with the operating revenues, which are generated <br /> by service and consumption charges. The Water O &M Fund receives about 5% of its <br /> revenue from non operating sources (which does not include revenue from connection <br /> fees). Most of the revenue comes from operations. <br /> 3.2. Revenue From Service charoes <br /> The City's service charges recover 81% of the current operating revenue from rates. This <br /> is an appropriate amount of revenue to be recovered from service charges based on <br /> guidelines provided by the California Urban Water Conservation Council. This Council <br /> has promulgated a guideline recommending that fixed charges such as the City's <br /> service charges should generate no more than 30% of the total rate revenue. Rates that <br /> generate at least 70% of the operating revenue from the consumption charges are <br /> deemed to be conservation oriented by the Council, which is regarded in California as <br /> an important rate- making criterion. <br /> We recommend maintaining the current relationship between the City's service and <br /> consumption charges whereby service charges continue to generate no more than <br /> approximately one -fifth of the operating revenue. City staff concurred and decided not <br /> to increase the service charges effective July 1, 2010. <br /> 3.3. Revenue From Consumption Charges <br /> As a default condition, each customer class should pay the same cost per unit through <br /> consumption charges unless conditions warrant otherwise. For example high peak <br /> March 18, 2010 Page 11 HF &H Consultants, LLC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.