Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton Water Rate Study <br /> 2. Revenue Requirement Projection <br /> proportionate share and that customers within each class are paying their proportionate <br /> shares. <br /> 2.2. REVENUE REQUIREMENTS <br /> The deficits in Figure 2 indicate a widening gap between expenses and revenues. <br /> Closing this gap by decreasing expenses is difficult because the single largest cost, Zone <br /> 7 water purchases (64% of the total revenue requirement), is a pass- through cost that is <br /> not controlled by the City. The remaining 32% for the local City O &M and capital <br /> expenses has only increased at sub inflation rates over the last five years. Further local <br /> cost reductions are no longer possible without significant reductions in service levels. <br /> With little opportunity to reduce costs, revenues must increase. City staff identified <br /> two areas to increase non -rate revenue. First, the General Fund will provide $330,000 <br /> annually to reimburse for the senior /low- income discount in water bills. Second, the <br /> City will recover more revenue from its backflow prevention program. City staff also <br /> identified one area where it was under collecting revenue from approximately 1,350 <br /> accounts with 1" services that were being charged for 5/8" services; this correction will <br /> generate $250,000 annually. <br /> The addition of $580,000 annually from the foregoing three areas is not sufficient to <br /> cover the deficit. An additional revenue increase of 21% is sufficient to nearly match <br /> the revenue requirement with revenue in FY 2010 -11, which is the first time this has <br /> occurred since FY 2005 -06. This revenue increase brings rate revenue on par with the <br /> revenue requirements, but does restore the fund balance to previous levels. <br /> With a higher revenue increase, reserves could be replenished and funding for the <br /> capital improvement program increased to previous levels. However, at this time, the <br /> magnitude of the recommended rate increase is such that City staff prefer to moderate <br /> increases through FY 2014 -15. After the recommended increase for FY 2010 -11, City <br /> staff proposes annual increases based on two components. <br /> 1. Costs associated with Zone 7 purchases will be adjusted equal to increases in <br /> Zone 7's annual rate increases, which are determined on a calendar year basis. <br /> Zone 7's current rate projections are shown in Figure 2 2. <br /> 2. All other costs, which are associated with the City's local O &M and capital <br /> expenditures, will be adjusted based on the CPI. <br /> March 18, 2010 Page 9 HF &H Consultants, LLC <br />