ORD 1109 - Laserfiche WebLink

a.5 Finding. The Reduced Intensity of Development Alternative, No Project Alternative, Increased Residential Capacity Alternative, Partial Approval Alternative or Mixed Use Alternative could partially mitigate the potential sig- nificant effect. However, each of these Alternatives is infeasible and unnecessary because the mitigation measures which have been incorporated into the Project substantially lessen the effect. a.6 Fact. See Section XII (for infeasibility of these Alternatives). a.7 Findinq. See Sections III.a.2, III.a.4 (Air Quality and Traffic Mitigations) . B. Siqnificant Effect. Generation of regional vehicular emissions related to commute trips in a non-attain- ment area for oxidant pollution. b.l Finding. The Traffic Conditions will sub- stantially lessen the effect. b.2 Fact. The Traffic Conditions will reduce regional traffic volumes, thus reducing vehicu- lar emissions both by reducing volume and improving level of service. b.3 Fact. The Tri-Valley balance of jobs to housing as demonstrated in Section 3.1 of the Draft EIR should cause a lessening of vehicle miles tra- velled and a concurrent reduction of vehicular emissions. b.4 Finding. The Reduced Intensity of Development Alternative, No Project Alternative, Increased Residential Capacity Alternative, Partial Ap- proval Alternative or Mixed Use Alternative could partially mitigate the potential effect. However, each of these Alternatives is infeasi- ble and unnecessary as Traffic Conditions will substantially lessen the effect. b.5 Fact. See Section XII (for infeasibility of these Alternatives). b.6 Fact. See Sections III.b.2 and III.b.3 (Traffic Mitigations: Tri-Valley JObs/Housing Balance). 6.