My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
08 ATTACHMENTS 4-10
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
020210
>
08 ATTACHMENTS 4-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2010 4:43:42 PM
Creation date
1/28/2010 2:29:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/2/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
08 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to ensure that the design of the future homes is consistent with the rural quality of the area, it <br /> does not adequately justify a higher density. <br /> STAFF RECOMMENDATION: <br /> Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: <br /> 1. Find that the proposed PUD development plan and related material, Exhibit B, are not <br /> consistent with the General Plan, the Happy Valley Specific Plan, and the purposes of <br /> the PUD ordinance (PMC 18.68); and is incompatible with previously developed <br /> properties in the vicinity and the natural, topographic features of the site. <br /> 2. Adopt a resolution denying the PUD -75 /PGPA -14 /PSPA -3, the application to amend the <br /> General Plan and the Happy Valley Specific Plan; and for Planned Unit Development <br /> approval for additional lots over the allotted number for the 6.13 -acre parcel. <br /> However, if the Planning Commission does not agree with the recommendation above and <br /> chooses to approve the project, staff recommends that the Commission proceed as follows: <br /> 1. Make the PUD findings as listed in the staff report, including that the proposed PUD <br /> development plan and related material, Exhibit B, are consistent with the General Plan, <br /> the Happy Valley Specific Plan, and the purposes of the PUD ordinance (PMC 18.68); <br /> and is compatible with previously developed properties in the vicinity and the natural, <br /> topographic features of the site, contingent on an environmental assessment for the <br /> increase in lots prior to forwarding the application to the City Council. <br /> 2. Adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council approve PGPA -14 amending the <br /> General Plan from allowing one dwelling unit per two gross acres to allowing two <br /> dwelling units per gross acre. <br /> 3. Adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council approve PSPA -3 amending the <br /> Happy Valley Specific Plan to allow the rezoning of the ±6.13 -acre property from the <br /> PUD -SRDR (Planned Unit Development Semi -Rural Density Residential) District, <br /> which allows one dwelling unit per two acres, to the PUD -LDR (Planned Unit <br /> Development Low Density Residential) District, to allow one dwelling unit per acre, <br /> thereby increasing the density from three to six lots. <br /> 4. Adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council approve PUD -75 to subdivide <br /> and create six lots on the +6.13 -acre property, subject to the development plan as <br /> shown in Exhibit B and contingent on Conditions of Approval for City Council review and <br /> approval. <br /> Staff Planner: Natalie Amos, Assistant Planner, 925.931.5613, namos(&ctpleasanton.ca.us <br /> PUD- 75/PGPA -14 /PSPA -3: Wentworth Planning Commission <br /> Page 13 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.