My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
08 ATTACHMENTS 4-10
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
020210
>
08 ATTACHMENTS 4-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2010 4:43:42 PM
Creation date
1/28/2010 2:29:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/2/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
08 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
workshop. He added that there would be no need to continue the item if the <br /> Commission is recommending denial. <br /> Chair Pearce asked the Commissioners what they wanted to do. <br /> Commissioner Blank stated that as the project stands today, he cannot support it as he <br /> does not have sufficient information. He added that there may be ways of redrawing the <br /> lines, eliminating one property, or other alternatives. He noted that he likes the idea of a <br /> continuance because it gives staff and the applicant time to determine whether or not <br /> anything else can be done. He indicated that he did not want to force a vote for its own <br /> sake. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that the applicant would have the opportunity to appeal <br /> the Commission's decision. <br /> Commissioner Narum stated that she agreed with Chair Pearce's suggestion to ask the <br /> applicant. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS RE- OPENED. <br /> Mr. Babbitt stated that he would be amenable to returning. He noted that staff had <br /> asked him to submit an application rather than return as a workshop. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor asked Mr. Babbitt if staff had indicated to him that they would <br /> also not support six lots. <br /> Mr. Babbitt replied that he knew that staff was not in favor of supporting six lots. He <br /> asked the Commission for more explicit direction regarding what it wanted to see when <br /> the project returned to the Commission. <br /> Chair Pearce suggested that a motion to continue be made and then provide detailed <br /> direction to the applicant. <br /> Commissioner Narum stated that any Commissioner can request to continue the item <br /> as long as there is no motion on the floor. <br /> Commissioner Blank clarified that when an individual Commissioner continues the item, <br /> it is automatically set for the next meeting. <br /> Mr. Dolan added that it could also be set to a date agreeable to all the Commissioners. <br /> Commissioner Pearce asked staff what kind of timeframe they were looking at. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that it would depend on the exhibits the Commission requests as well <br /> as the applicant's timeline and ability to prepare the exhibits. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 15, 2009 Page 4 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.