My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
08 ATTACHMENTS 4-10
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
020210
>
08 ATTACHMENTS 4-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2010 4:43:42 PM
Creation date
1/28/2010 2:29:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/2/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
08 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the lot line is an appropriate idea and that there may be other things that could be done <br /> by moving some lot lines around. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that by the time the public amenities, the road, and the <br /> well were removed, less than six acres would be left, and that cannot be split into <br /> one -acre lots. <br /> Commissioner Blank stated that this is a piece of property in a weird position, with a <br /> developer who is willing to do 200 LEED points, where the City has seen maybe only <br /> one other developer willing to do 200 LEED points and it was a large house. <br /> Commissioner Fox stated that six houses using 200 LEED points of energy is more than <br /> three houses using the normal LEED points. <br /> Commissioner Blank clarified that he was not necessarily in favor of six houses but that <br /> he finds it significant that a developer is willing to do 200 LEED points. He noted that he <br /> is not a LEED point expert and did not know whether four houses doing 50 LEED points <br /> was the same as three houses with 200 LEED points. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that these houses could get 200 LEED points but that <br /> three houses at 50 LEED points each would probably be using less energy. <br /> Commissioner Blank stated that he was not sure the LEED points are necessarily <br /> energy savings or energy use. Commissioner Olson agreed that it was not energy use. <br /> Commissioner Olson stated that another way to mitigate this would be to reduce the <br /> floor area ratio (FAR) of the houses, thereby building smaller homes on each lot but still <br /> getting 200 LEED points each. <br /> Commissioner Blank stated that it would be helpful for the Commission to know if a <br /> home with 50 LEED points consumes four times the energy or creates four times the <br /> carbon footprint of a home with 200 LEED points. <br /> Ms. Seto stated that LEED points, which stands for Leadership and Environmental <br /> Energy Design, does not just relate to energy usage but could also be achieved by <br /> using recyclable materials such as for carpet, water usage, drought tolerant plants, and <br /> landscape irrigation systems. <br /> Commissioner Blank inquired what the maximum amount of LEED points is, and <br /> Ms. Seto stated that she was not certain. Ms. Amos clarified that LEED points relates to <br /> commercial projects and that residential uses green building points. <br /> Mr. Babbitt noted that there is a maximum of 350 points for Build it Green. Ms. Amos <br /> agreed, stating that one cannot check everything off the list for a building as it is <br /> because there could be one LEED point for a certain type of demolition and construction <br /> or 50- percent drought tolerant plants, or you could also have 75- percent drought <br /> EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 14, 2009 Page 9 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.