My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 120909
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
PC 120909
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:41:53 PM
Creation date
1/28/2010 10:52:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/9/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
volumes are essentially the same, and the intersection at Santa Rita Road and Valley <br />Avenue is at capacity. He added that this is the reason why he periodically asks for <br />widenings. He stated that the City actually has about a 200-vehicle reduction on Santa <br />Rita Road going southbound, but when Stoneridge Drive takes those 200 vehicles and <br />puts them on Stoneridge Drive, it takes those vehicles currently using Kolln Drive and <br />Mohr Avenue to bypass the Santa Rita Road and Valley Avenue intersection. He noted <br />that there would then be a zero net change at the intersection, but a 200-vehicle <br />reduction on Kolln Drive. <br />Commissioner Pentin referred to Backyard Noise by Proposed Bridges on page 10 of <br />the staff report and noted that at the end of the first paragraph, it states that future <br />airport-related noise adds a decibel or two. He inquired why that is part of this EIR and <br />why the City would have be concerned about the additional airport noise in this EIR as <br />being a significant and unavoidable impact. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that it adds to the cumulative scenario. <br />Commissioner Blank inquired whether there would not have been residences near the <br />bridges in the other EIR. He stated that he believed the subject was discussed <br />extensively in the other EIR. <br />Ms. Harryman replied that this addresses the 4 dBA significant increase criteria. <br />Commissioner Pentin inquired if it was over the 4 dBA with or without the airport. <br />Ms. Harryman replied that it is both with and without the airport. <br />Commissioner Pentin referred to the repaving and inquired, even with ACSPA putting in <br />$500,000 to fund it, what the replacement schedule was and whether it would have to <br />be done with the same type of paving. <br />Mr. Bocian replied that he was not certain if the replacement has been scheduled to be <br />completed in a specific year and that it would have been done with the same type of <br />paving. <br />Commissioner Olson inquired if there is a follow-up process to ensure that all <br />mitigations discussed are actually carried out. He referred to the list of best <br />management practices relative to the GHG emissions mitigation and indicated that he <br />appreciates that it is a moving target for the City; however, he noted that some of the <br />mitigations would happen given the design of the project or they could be built in once <br />the project is completed. His indicated that if he were looking at this from a public <br />standpoint, he would get a comfortable feeling knowing that it will happen. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that there are three ways mitigation becomes mandatory: first, if it is <br />incorporated into the project as part of the proposal; second, if it is a condition of <br />approval which is enforced just like all conditions; and third, if it is included as a <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 9, 2009 Page 7 of 12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.