Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Narum stated that she was interested in a follow-up for the Redcoats use <br />permit, adding that she believed it would warrant some serious attention going into the <br />warm weather season, given added activity in the outdoor area. <br />Mr. Dolan stated that he would be happy to do it in this case or in any case the <br />Commission wants it done, but would prefer not to have this administrative burden on <br />those applications that are not controversial. He noted that the easiest way to ensure <br />that this is done is for the Commission to express its opinion in the form of an additional <br />condition upon project approval. He added that staff will assume that this would be an <br />added condition for the Redcoats approval. <br />Chair Pearce felt another option would be for a Commissioner to call staff and check on <br />the status of the use permit. <br />Mr. Dolan advised that if this is done as a condition, staff would place it on a tickler and <br />would know to do it. <br />Commissioner Narum agreed, noting that it is important that the entire Commission <br />receive the information rather than just one Commissioner. <br />Commissioner O’Connor noted that there were only two property owners contiguous to <br />the pub who voiced concern with the project. <br />Commissioner Pentin noted that emails were received, and there were people who <br />supported the business and others who commented that the business was doing <br />whatever it wanted without concern for residents. <br />8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW/ACTION <br />a. Future Planning Calendar <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />b. Actions of the City Council <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />c. Actions of the Zoning Administrator <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 18, 2009 Page 23 of 25 <br /> <br />