My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 111809
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
PC 111809
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:41:46 PM
Creation date
1/28/2010 10:48:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/18/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Narum stated that she likes Redcoats and wants it to be successful and <br />that she loves what the Byrd brothers did to bring the building back up to what it looks <br />like today. She noted that there is no condition that the applicant will provide security <br />during the nights music is played and agreed with Commissioner O’Connor that it is <br />already included in Exhibit A. She indicated that she believes that the area must <br />generally be policed and that the owner understands the ramifications of not doing <br />policing the area. <br />Commissioner Blank noted that the Commission has not required this of any other <br />business owner but that he thinks it is in their best interest to have security. He <br />indicated that he did not personally want security specified but questioned what would <br />occur if Ms. Kennard decides to terminate the security firm and return to using her own <br />employees. He indicated that he felt the conditions were very specific and encouraged <br />the people to contact staff if there is a violation of the CUP, which Code Enforcement <br />can then address. He added that if the violation gets out of hand, the permit can return <br />to the Planning Commission for reconsideration. <br />Commissioner Narum suggested having for a six month review such as a written <br />summary from staff as to whether there have been any complaints. She stated that she <br />thinks there needs to be a balance between businesses and residents. <br />Commissioner Blank supported holding the review but voiced concern that people could <br />purposely call police regularly if they know such a report is to be submitted at a <br />specified period of time. <br />Mr. Dolan confirmed that the permit can be returned to the Planning Commission should <br />a problem arise with compliance with the conditions. He expressed concern that the <br />review would add to what Planning already does for all use permits. <br />Commissioner Narum indicated that she did not want to get into designing but <br />suggested improvement to the smoking area, citing additional signage, lighting, and a <br />second bench. <br />Mr. Dolan advised that the critical dimension is 20 feet. He added that everyone agrees <br />that the improvement of the alley is a good idea and that it has been brought up in <br />discussions on the CIP but was not ranked anywhere near top of the wish list. <br />Commissioner Blank inquired about the potential of moving the bench towards St. Mary <br />Street. <br />Mr. Dolan said he has not personally witnessed the situation of smokers ignoring the <br />bench and that there seems to be a mixed opinion as to whether this is successful or <br />not. He added that exploring the addition of bricks around the area might improve the <br />attractiveness, having the receptacle there helps, and said signage as suggested by <br />Mr. Finch and agreed to by Ms. Kennard is relatively easy and most likely will be very <br />effective. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 18, 2009 Page 12 of 25 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.