Laserfiche WebLink
that enhancement to the building wall by the entrance will occur potentially with texture <br />or landscaping, and wrapping of the glass windows on the corner of the Ice Center <br />would be required. <br />Ms. Giffin stated that staff received two comments in support of the Ice Center and two <br />comments in opposition. She added that a comment was also made that the <br />Neighborhood Park should be labeled “storm water detention,” “miscellaneous,” or <br />“adjunct to commercial” since such a large portion of the basin is dedicated to hydro <br />modification. She noted that detailed public comments were provided to the Planning <br />Commission. <br />Jon Gustafson, General Manager, Sharks Ice, representing SJAM and the San Jose <br />Sharks, noted that he oversees all of the public recreational ice facilities that the <br />company manages and that he is currently managing three properties in San Jose, <br />Fremont, and Oakland. He introduced Wayne Rasmussen, Lead Consultant; Peter <br />Petruzzi, Project Architect; David Gates, Landscape Architect; and Pat Kernan, Legal <br />Advisor. He discussed the Sharks’ overall operating philosophy and described the Ice <br />Center as a state-of-the-art and efficient facility that will achieve LEED standards and <br />will be used by both young and old, abled and disabled. He then presented the facility’s <br />floor plan, describing its different features on each level. He thanked staff for their hard <br />work and indicated his agreement with the staff report recommendation. He added that <br />he looks forward to a long partnership with the City. <br />David Gates, Landscape Architect, spoke of linkages, the connection to the future <br />development, and the relationship between the active zone and entry plaza of the <br />facility. He indicated that parking is secondary to the nature of the park and that tried to <br />let the landscape work with the building with large oaks and large trees. He then <br />described the different landscape features, circulation, and seating elements of the <br />facility. <br />Peter Petruzzi, Project Architect, stated that the building has a very unique character <br />and definition because it needs to provide requisite and adequate facilities in an <br />architectural style and form that encourages community participation and respects the <br />context of the neighborhood.He noted that the building creates a solar challenge which <br />provides an opportunity for energy conservation. He explained that with a plan area of <br />over 15,000 square feet and a total floor area of over 141,000 square feet, the <br />complexities and the scale of the building and the need to reconcile them in a park led <br />to an approach that allows the building to act as a backdrop, visually connecting its <br />context and contributing to a sense of place. <br />Mr. Petruzzi stated that the form of the building basically follows the functions within. <br />He discussed the formation of the rinks, the minimization of floor area, and the reduction <br />in the amount of air that needs to be conditioned by bringing the sloped roof down as <br />much as possible. He explained that by taking the second floor and putting it on top of <br />the core that serves the rinks, they have been able to keep the footprint lower in size. <br />He indicated that they added clerestory windows to bring light into the interior at the <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 5, 2009 Page 6 of 19 <br /> <br />