Laserfiche WebLink
decided to purchase the property. He stated that the actual details of the land <br />transaction have not been finalized, but the basic concepts are that the City and all the <br />developers will contribute towards the purchase of the land, the detention area, and <br />improvements. He indicated that the City will purchase the non-detention areas of the <br />Park, and the City anticipates working with CLC, the owner/operator of the Continuing <br />Care Community, to make improvements on that Park. He added that the City will <br />operate and maintain the entire Park, including the detention basin. <br />Mr. Bocian stated that the City anticipates ground leasing about eight acres of the <br />17-acre Community Park to San Jose Area Management, LP (SJAM) to operate the Ice <br />Center. He added that the City expects SJAM to construct the entire Park, make <br />financial contributions to the non-ground leased areas of the Park, and assume the <br />responsibilities for the leased areas of the Park. He noted that staff is still working out <br />the details of the ground lease and that staff expects the ground lease area to come <br />with a development agreement. He stated that this development, which will come <br />before the Planning Commission at a future meeting, has not yet been finalized <br />because it is linked to the ground lease.Finally, he indicated that the City will be <br />responsible for maintaining the non-leased ground area and that the Sharks will <br />maintain the leased area. <br />Mr. Bocian then turned over the presentation to Mike Fulford, City Landscape Architect, <br />to discuss the elements in the Parks. <br />Mike Fulford stated that staff, CLC, and SJAM worked collaboratively together on the <br />Parks, adding that they are pleased with the way the Parks have turned out given some <br />on-site obstacles and constraints. He noted that both Parks conform to the Bay Friendly <br />guidelines. He indicated that the Community Park is a nice blend of active recreation <br />areas, a children’s play apparatus area, a wet play area, and an open turf meadow. He <br />stated that the very active recreation area consists of a children’s play area which is <br />divided for two age groups, 2-5 years and 6-12 years, and separated by a wet play <br />area. <br />Mr. Fulford then described an open meadow and a passive area of the park with a <br />meandering pathway, located to the south. He stated that there will be a mix of <br />indigenous plantings and food plants for song birds, and that the landscaping will <br />transition into a riparian area. He indicated that the park is bounded on its west side by <br />a double row of shade trees which reinforce the edge of the active recreation area, even <br />though the turf will visually seem to continue on into the parking lot. <br />Mr. Fulford stated that all the elements are very durable; while the site furnishings for <br />both parks share materials and a look, the Community Park and the Neighborhood Park <br />will have their own identities. He noted that the relocation of the tennis courts, which <br />are completely fenced and lighted, was supported by players and that the parking lot <br />consists of ten parallel spaces along the edge which should be more than enough for <br />players using the courts. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 5, 2009 Page 4 of 19 <br /> <br />