My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 110509 Special Meeting
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
PC 110509 Special Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:41:38 PM
Creation date
1/28/2010 10:46:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/5/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Giffin replied that this condition is more flexible than what staff would normally <br />propose in that these events would be subject to the review and approval of the Director <br />of Parks and Community Services in the event some type of event were to occur. She <br />noted that temporary events usually require use permits, and this condition <br />acknowledges that these events can occur without a formal review if approved by the <br />Director. <br />Commissioner Narum inquired if this condition applied to both parks. <br />Ms. Giffin said yes. <br />Commissioner Pentin stated that he spent time with both Mr. Gustafson and Ms. Giffin <br />regarding the Ice Center. He referred to the lighting and indicated that there is a <br />request to move the hour lighting to 85 to 100 feet. He noted that it is already 1.1 or 1.2 <br />foot candles in some places and inquired if this would drop them below 1 foot candle. <br />Mr. Fulford replied that there is a group called the Society of Illuminating Engineers and <br />they recommend a minimum of 1 foot candle for pathway lighting for easy traverse. He <br />indicated that virtually none of the City’s parks have that level of lighting but have an <br />average of it. He noted that in most parks, pathway lighting are placed 80-85 feet apart <br />and provides pools of light. He added that in high light areas, those pathway lights are <br />placed fairly close together, and that light fixtures are spaced farther apart farther away <br />in the park so as not to be glaring but comfortable. <br />Commissioner Pentin referred to the emergency generators to be placed at the back of <br />the building. He expressed concern that there is just so much space before the arroyo <br />and inquired how they would be placed and what steps could be taken to ensure they <br />are closed or covered so that the arroyo is still protected. <br />Ms. Giffin replied that the location for the generators has not been decided at this time <br />and that it is anticipated that there will be at least one emergency generator. She noted <br />that the Code exempts generators from the noise regulations but that the Commission <br />could add a condition either stating that a masonry wall be put around the generator or <br />requiring the generator to meet the same noise requirement required for any other use <br />on the park property. <br />Commissioner Pentin noted that in the general conditions on page 3, the approved <br />building colors and materials are to be indicated in the final building permit plans and <br />that substitutions will not be allowed unless otherwise approved by the Director of Parks <br />and Community Services. He indicated that he would think this would come back to <br />Planning rather than Parks. <br />Ms. Giffin replied that this could be changed as recommended by the Commission. <br />Commissioner Pentin referred to the general conditions on the LEED requirements that <br />if the project meets the bicycle rack requirements for the LEED points, there would be a <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 5, 2009 Page 12 of 19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.