My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092309
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
PC 092309
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:41:17 PM
Creation date
1/28/2010 10:42:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/23/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
comments from previous speakers and stated that she has noticed more crime and <br />violence since more apartments units constructed behind her complex. She added that <br />her Lexus was recently stolen from her driveway and that a lot of crimes have been <br />occurring around the WalMart and apartment areas. She expressed concern that <br />friends and relatives of the renters of the proposed 1,100 units will add more traffic and <br />more crime to the area and urged the Commission not to approve the application. <br />Mary Keck stated that she moved with her seven-year-old daughter from San Francisco <br />to the Sienna development in Pleasanton, mostly for its school district, relocation with <br />her employer, and for ownership and pride. She indicated that high rises do not belong <br />in town and that this type of development would decrease house values. She <br />expressed concern about safety and escalating crime in the area, stating that people no <br />longer ride their bikes or walk along the trail between Sienna and Valencia <br />developments and the apartment complex because a man was recently held at gunpoint <br />along that trail and his wallet taken. She stated that bringing in an additional 1,100 units <br />of low income near the BART station is an added invitation for more family members <br />and friends to visit. She urged the Commission to keep Pleasanton safe. <br />Chaitali Wagh, a senior at Foothill High School, stated that her family moved from <br />Walnut Creek to the Sienna neighborhood last year because they found it to be a safe <br />environment where they can go out at night without being afraid. She echoed the <br />comments of speakers and noted that her school’s class size has increased from 35 to <br />45 students. She stated that some students in her English and History classes sit on <br />the floor because there are not enough desks due to budget cuts. She added that more <br />houses will bring in more students, which would mean a greater ratio between students <br />and counselors who are needed to discuss college plans. <br />Debora Sanders stated that she moved to Valencia in 2007 and that she agrees with <br />the comments of earlier speakers. She indicated that she attended the neighborhood <br />meeting a week ago to learn about the plans. She noted that because only eight <br />residents attended the workshop, she walked the Valencia neighborhood and informed <br />the residents, a majority of whom were unaware of the rezonings proposed. She stated <br />that she understood that growth needs to take place; however, the residents need <br />opportunities other than staff reports to understand the impacts this rezoning will have <br />on them. She reiterated the concern that the joint task force has not been set up. <br />Shaivali Parekh, a senior at Foothill High School, stated that there are not enough <br />desks for students in some classrooms because the class sizes have increased from <br />35 to 45 students, and teachers are not able to pay attention to students. She indicated <br />that she and her family moved to Pleasanton from Fremont a year and a half ago and <br />that she likes living in Pleasanton and wants to raise her children here. She added that <br />her grades have also improved since she moved to Pleasanton. She stated not <br />everyone who lives in Pleasanton works in Pleasanton and that the BART station <br />argument was not a valid reason to build more apartments. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 23, 2009 Page 8 of 34 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.