Laserfiche WebLink
another facility to be built to accommodate the children, and the money will be <br />generated from the development that occurs to pay for those facilities. He stated that it <br />is supposed to work in tandem that way, but given the State budget situation, the impact <br />has been dramatic and unfortunate; however, this was somewhat unrelated to the <br />number of facilities. <br />Commissioner Narum inquired if the City would get a response from the School District <br />with a PUD application. <br />Mr. Roush replied that the City would see it in the context of the Master Plan, i.e., what <br />are the likely scenarios of numbers of children the development would generate, what <br />are the facilities available, and how will it be paid for. <br />Commissioner Narum inquired how many units the City still has to allocate to reach the <br />housing cap. <br />Ms. Stern replied that there are 2,007 units that could be allocated under the new <br />General Plan which were not already shown on the land use map of the 1996 General <br />Plan. She added that there are about 2,400 units to be built under the cap. <br />Commissioner Narum inquired if the 2,007 units included the Windstar development. <br />Ms. Stern said yes. She continued that there is a placeholder assumption in East <br />Pleasanton for 250 units, an assumption there would be some densification of Kottinger <br />Gardens, Pleasanton Place, and certain reserved units that had not been allocated. <br />Commissioner Narum inquired if these could be accommodated and still have some left <br />over. <br />Ms. Stern said yes. <br />Commissioner Pentin requested clarification of an earlier statement that to meet the <br />RHNA numbers, the City only has to rezone for it and does not have to build the units. <br />Ms. Stern said yes. <br />Chair Pearce stated that there seems to be some confusion or lack of information about <br />the Task Force in terms of the formulation of the PUD major modification. She <br />requested staff to walk the Commission through the composition of the Task Force and <br />the process anticipated. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that the item is tentatively scheduled to come before the Council at <br />the first meeting in November, at which time the composition will be finalized. He stated <br />that what came out of the joint meeting was that there would be a committee that would <br />comprise of at least two Councilmembers and two Planning Commissioners, and that <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 23, 2009 Page 16 of 34 <br /> <br />