CCMIN102009 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mayor Hosterman said she is very impressed with her colleagues in light of what is a difficult and contentious issue. She assumed some culpability for the disconnect between the Council and the public on this matter but said that she left the joint workshop with the understanding that the task force would be put together following the conclusion of the General Plan update and Staples Ranch discussions. Neither was anticipated to take as long as they did, but she is ultimately very pleased with the update and its principles, plans, programs, and policies. She noted that Pleasanton is one of the first cities in the state to include elements on water and energy, address state mandates on greenhouse gas emissions, and incorporate a theme of sustainability. The entire RHNA issue is unsustainable and she and staff worked for some time on instituting a different perspective on jobs, housing, and how the two meet. She noted that Pleasanton has been on both ends of that scale, at one point being a bedroom community to the Silicon Valley and offering little employment. She suggested that considering those issues on a more regional basis would show a better balanced jobs -to- housing ratio. She voiced disappointment that state law has been manipulated in such a way that Pleasanton has come so close to losing local control over development. She assured the public that tonight's recommendations are not scare tactics and that the City is embroiled in a very real lawsuit which will largely determine the extent to which it can govern the future of the community. She said she intends to make every decision in the collective best interests of the community and that she believes that means supporting the rezoning of all three properties, with the recommended task force. She requested that the task force be brought forth at a November Council meeting and invited the public to participate. Councilmember McGovern asked for clarification on the motion and which properties it would support rezoning. Councilmember Thorne said that, without divulging what was discussed in Closed Session, he believes that rezoning all three properties would provide the best opportunity with pending litigation. Councilmember McGovern argued that only two properties would be required to satisfy the 2003 RHNA requirement of 521 units. Vice -Mayor Cook Kallio said she would support the rezoning of all three because it shows a clear intent to comply. She reiterated that zoning does equal an entitlement to build. She said that the entire reason the Council is voting on this now as opposed to later is to present the strongest possible argument to the courts. She believed this would indicate intent to comply with the first RHNA requirements, as well as make a dent in the second and that the initiation of a task force indicates a clear intent to move forward with the matter. Councilmember McGovern said she would strongly prefer to rezone only sites 1 and 2. She noted that the preferred plan outlined in the General Plan calls for dispersal of housing units throughout the community and that 14 different properties have been identified as potentials for high- density housing. She advised against focusing entirely on Hacienda Business Park and said that if the task force determined that lot 3 would be beneficial, it could return with that recommendation. Vice -Mayor Cook Kallio requested confirmation that the third parcel would fulfill a very small portion of present RHNA requirements. City Council Minutes Page 18 of 25 October 20, 2009