My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN102009
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
CCMIN102009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2010 2:10:12 PM
Creation date
1/12/2010 2:10:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/20/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN102009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Park has its own internal approval process which runs concurrently with the City's, and noted <br /> that all three proposed sites have been vetted through this process, with nearly 80% approval. <br /> The owners would like to move forward with the planning process and fully support the <br /> participation of all stakeholders. <br /> Jack Dove requested that the Council approve the staff recommendation. He works with 10 or <br /> more sites in town which could support affordable housing and was also vice -chair of the <br /> Housing Element committee. He believes the City must consider all possible locations rather <br /> than assume another opportunity will arise to satisfy these needs. He said that approval of this <br /> rezoning would allow all of these questions to be answered when a development proposal is <br /> actually brought forth and cautioned that waiting will never provide the type of housing this <br /> community so desperately needs. <br /> Nick Gandhi said that parents face so many issues in terms of boundary and school changes <br /> that it is overwhelming. He said that he chose to live in a democratic county because he <br /> appreciates the democratic process and asked why the public was not provided with an <br /> opportunity to participate at the outset. He said that if the task force which was promised in 2008 <br /> had been established, this would not be such a contentious issue. He questioned statements <br /> that a high- density development here would induce substantial population growth but with less <br /> than significant impacts to recreation, traffic, and schools. He requested that residents be <br /> allowed to participate in the zoning and PUD process and that the Council denies this request <br /> and directs staff to review all reports for accuracy. <br /> Ashok Moghe said that the public has not been included in the zoning process, though they <br /> have as much of a financial involvement in the business park as its owners. He questioned the <br /> validity of data provided and disagreed with the determination that impacts would be less than <br /> significant. He said that the overcrowding of schools and parks are very significant to those who <br /> live there. He requested that the Council direct staff to provide current data and include the <br /> public in the decision making process. <br /> Stan Kataoka, Valencia HOA president, said that residents have voiced a number of concerns <br /> over the last several weeks. He said that much of that concern was unnecessary and could <br /> have been allayed by the task force which was promised. He said that following that promise, <br /> residents believed their interests were protected and disengaged from the process pending <br /> further information. He said that this process is very important to him and his neighbors as it <br /> gives a sense of the raw data available and provides the opportunity to rebut or question some <br /> of the points presented. He requested that the Council refrain from making any irreversible <br /> decisions until the public has had a chance to vet that information. <br /> Makarand Walimbe thanked the Council for responding to his earlier email. He said that public <br /> involvement in the task force should have happened from day one and that the failure to do so <br /> should be rectified now. He said he does not necessarily oppose additional housing but <br /> questioned the outdated studies and negative declaration presented this evening. He urged the <br /> Council to get the community involved in making this a decent, successful, and timely project. <br /> Bo Tian said he was one of the 19 speakers at the September 23, 2009 Planning Commission <br /> meeting and that all those speakers opposed these rezoning efforts. He said 2 of the speakers <br /> that night were Foothill High School seniors who described class sizes that had reached <br /> inappropriate numbers. He said the state budget crisis would not likely improve in the near <br /> future and questioned how the Council could consider adding to the burden schools already <br /> City Council Minutes Page 13 of 25 October 20, 2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.