Laserfiche WebLink
Staff is proposing that this matter be submitted to the City Council for authorization to <br /> have staff meet with Eden to negotiate modified agreements to implement Option 1. Mr. <br /> Bocian summarized that staffs recommendation is for the Housing Commission to <br /> approve Option 1 and to recommend that the City Council adopt it as well. <br /> Chairperson Jones asked Mr. Bocian if the agreement provides that the City assumes <br /> ownership of the project after 55 years. Mr. Bocian affirmed this and stated further that <br /> the City could take over ownership now if desired. <br /> Mr. Bocian discussed the benefits of having Eden Housing own the project. Eden would <br /> charge a nominal management fee of approximately $20,000 per year and financial <br /> management fee of approximately $15,000 per year. <br /> In response to a question from Commissioner Wiest, Mr. Bocian stated that Eden does <br /> not currently receive an asset management fee. He noted that Eden currently receives <br /> only an accounting fee on a regular basis but further clarified that Eden received a <br /> developer fee early on in the project. <br /> Commissioner Whisnand asked about the new ownership entity. Steven Bocian <br /> explained that typically the nonprofit forms additional limited partnerships that own each <br /> individual development. The board of Eden would serve as the board of for the new <br /> nonprofit. For example, an agency may have fifteen different housing projects, each of <br /> which is owned by a separate legal entity, but all of which are controlled by the same <br /> board. <br /> Chairperson Jones indicated he supports Option 1. He noted that Eden has been a <br /> pleasure to work with over the years and has done a great job. <br /> Commissioner Whisnand asked about Ridge View Commons funding. Steven Bocian <br /> replied that as part of the funding for this project the City received payments from the tax <br /> credit investor. That money served three purposes: (1) to repay the City for financial <br /> contributions that it made to the project; (2) to form a security deposit for the California <br /> Housing Finance Agency inasmuch as the project did not have cash flow; and (3) to <br /> provide a "pot of money" from which the City could draw in the event the project had <br /> operating deficits. Eden has suggested $20,000 annually, and staff will meet with them <br /> to work out the details. <br /> Vice Chairperson Stark agrees that Eden is an excellent asset manager. He feels that the <br /> proposed $20,000 annual asset management fee is nominal. He queried the funding <br /> source. Steven Bocian replied that the funds would come from the Ridge View <br /> Commons reserve fund. The goal is for the project to be financially self sufficient. <br /> However, he noted that the project will never be expected to turn a profit. <br /> Page -2- <br />