Laserfiche WebLink
face. He noted that the group of speakers was also diverse. He requested that additional <br /> studies be done so that the public can be sure that its decision is right for Pleasanton's future. <br /> John Steinbuch, representing property owner W.P. Carey, said he has been involved with the <br /> Hacienda PUD efforts since Carey purchased the Shaklee property in 2004. He supported the <br /> City's efforts to rezone all three properties and said he anxiously awaits the subcommittee <br /> formation and his participation in that effort. <br /> Don Reber, BRE Properties, said his company has owned the site since 2006 and been <br /> involved in the process since the property was under contract in 2003. He supported efforts to <br /> move forward with rezoning and the PUD modification process. He acknowledged that any <br /> rezoning action would in no way approve any development on the site and that whatever is <br /> proposed there will be the result of extensive community engagement. He said he shares some <br /> of the residents' concerns and promised that whatever is ultimately built there will be attractive, <br /> be of very high quality, and fit with the surrounding neighborhood's character and scale. He said <br /> that rezoning action would enhance the property values of existing residents as well as park <br /> owners and supported moving forward with the task force. <br /> David Spark, East Bay Association of Realtors, said that there has been considerable public <br /> comment and staff analysis related to impacts on property values as a result of the rezoning of <br /> these parcels. He concurred with staff's observation that many issues beyond land use <br /> decisions are impacting these values. He acknowledged that any decision made this evening <br /> does not obligate or guarantee that any development on these parcels would take place anytime <br /> soon or at all. He said that, given Pleasanton's tradition of public involvement and scrutiny in the <br /> planning process, he is certain that any development will be of extremely high quality. He stated <br /> concern that failure to rezone these parcels in a timely fashion could open the City to additional <br /> litigation and ultimately complicate the public involvement process. He cautioned that this could <br /> lead to land use decisions being made by the court, which would undoubtedly be much less <br /> sensitive to the needs of the community. <br /> Annita Auyang said that the area's parks and schools are already extremely congested. She <br /> said that the business park has a unique character and encouraged consideration of alternative <br /> locations for high- density housing so that business can be expanded here. <br /> Jan Batcheller urged the Council to approve staffs recommendation. She said that the current <br /> Housing Element provides an obligation to provide additional housing and that, from the <br /> standpoint of the entire community, there is no better location to do so. She noted that transit <br /> oriented development was discussed throughout the entire review of the General Plan and <br /> thought that should serve as its own form of public notice. She said that current litigation is the <br /> result of procrastination and that lawsuits have no real winners. She said approval of this <br /> rezoning would go a long way towards showing good faith in resolving this issue and urged the <br /> Council to do everything possible to keep it from proceeding further. <br /> Becky Dennis said that in addition to serving on the City Council, she has been a community <br /> organizer and avid advocate of open space preservation, which has provided her with a good <br /> sense of what residents want in terms of control and assurances. She noted that she was the <br /> third approving Council vote when the housing at Hacienda was being considered, and said that <br /> she paid a hefty political price for what was then an unpopular decision. Pleasanton is often the <br /> victim of its own success, providing such lovely neighborhoods that residents don't believe it can <br /> be done again. She cautioned that any further delay on this action could eliminate the public's <br /> options, while approving this evening would put Pleasanton a bit ahead of the game in the eyes <br /> City Council Minutes Page 14 of 25 October 20, 2009 <br />