01 - Laserfiche WebLink

short, the following options: 1) direct staff to examine alternative locations and assemble the previously approved task force ASAP, or 2) approve a conditional grant for rezoning the minimum number of parcels required to address the 2003 Housing Element requirements, with the provision that the task force be established immediately. His proposal continued, to request that the task force include input from all stakeholders, is tasked with approving any and all plans to be presented before the Planning Commission and City Council, and ensures that there is no financial impact to residential stakeholders as a result of such plans. He asked the Council to remember its commitment to the community in considering its decision and distributed a written copy of his proposal. Shenggao Li said that as an engineer, he doubts that the proposed density could be supported. He said that while this development may provide short-term financial benefits to the City, the burden of increased infrastructure costs will result in an overall negative impact. He also requested additional data on all impacts identified this evening. Barbara Hempill said that Pleasanton's employment opportunities have grown vastly in the past 25 years but while some of these jobs are at the executive level, the majority are service level positions. She said that these jobs make the comfortable lifestyle here possible, yet most of these employees cannot afford to live here and enjoy them as well. She said that Pleasanton is limited in its supply of land which is both available and meets Housing Element requirements for high- density zoning. She said that this rezoning would help to address the local jobs housing imbalance as well as provide amenities offered by transit oriented development. She urged the Council to seize this opportunity and enable Pleasanton to achieve a better balance by including workers from the entire pay spectrum, decrease traffic congestion, decrease pollution, and improve the quality and stability of family life. Dolores Bengston said everyone is Pleasanton is a stakeholder in what happens here; she understands and appreciates that those residing in the Hacienda community may feel threatened by the proposed rezoning, but noted the very same arguments were used when the very housing they live in was first proposed. She suggested that the PUD process would sufficiently address the concerns expressed tonight and at previous meetings. She said that while most Pleasanton residents complain of traffic, they fail to accept responsibility for exacerbating the problem by limiting entry-level workforce housing and forcing so many workers to live elsewhere. She believes that the fabric of the City is strengthened by increasing the number of people who live and work here, applauded efforts to bring this item forward and encouraged the Council to act now, with foresighted courage, and support the rezoning of all three properties. Patricia Belding, Citizens for a Caring Community, said the course of her work has enabled her to meet many people in the community in need of housing. She provided a thumbnail description of some, noting that they are everyone from young teachers to veterans to employers who cannot staff their businesses with local employees. She read the minutes of the September 13, 2009 Planning Commission meeting and learned that some Pleasanton residents see them as "those people," a reference that she deemed ignorant and regrettable. She found similar change fearful when Hacienda Business Park was first proposed, agreed that change is difficult, but thought that the rich, mixed -use community which the General Plan envisions for this area would enliven the entire community. James Paxson, Hacienda Business Park, said he very much supports staff's position and is very anxious to move forward with the planning process. He assured the Council and public that the park is committed to maximizing every opportunity and benefit here. He said Hacienda Business City Council Minutes Page 12 of 25 October 20, 2009