My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 040908
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 040908
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:37:02 PM
Creation date
12/4/2009 9:33:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/9/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
PC 040908
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
As regards the color of the tank, she noted that she had a few choices and that she chose <br />green because it best blended in with the environment. She described that the old tank <br />was made of wood and tension straps that needed constant maintenance; it had a cover on <br />the top that was the access to the tank. She added that she found the tank unsafe because <br />children could climb up to the top and fall into the tank. She noted that her property and <br />455 Sycamore Road were originally one property and that the previous owner had <br />subdivided the property and made 455 Sycamore Road a flag- shaped lot, which meant it <br />had no street presence or frontage and had a shared common entry and a long driveway. <br />She continued that with a flag- shaped property, the owner would be surrounded and <br />would have the view of your neighbor's back yard. She noted that she lost some privacy <br />by virtue of her being in front of the flag lot with the long driveway, which is her <br />sideyard, sometimes being utilized as a parking lot, having a view of big RV's, and being <br />a speedway for motorcycles and sports cars. She noted that she used to live in a <br />subdivision with neighbors living practically on top of one another, but they all got along <br />and minded their own business. <br />Ms. Rocha indicated that all the neighbors she has talked to have complimented her on <br />the work she had put into her property; however, she has received nothing but complaints <br />from the neighbor that benefited most from the transformation. She stated that the <br />property was in disrepair with overgrown vegetation, makeshift stables, and storage sheds <br />showing signs of years of neglect. She added that there were two 20 -foot by 40 -foot <br />accessory structures in the back that were structurally unsafe, as well as mounts of debris <br />and scraps of wood piled high which created a home for rodents and pests. She noted <br />that this was the view that the property owners at 455 Sycamore Road had to look at, but <br />they were screened by the many mature oak trees along their "front yard." She added <br />that she strategically planted 30 sequoia redwood trees as to provide even more <br />screening. She continued that shortly after she had completed the cleanup and <br />landscaping work, the owners of 455 Sycamore Road decided to remove all their trees, <br />which now opened up their view into her backyard. She noted that she had no objection <br />to their action since these were not her trees; however, she thought that before removing <br />the trees, they should have considered what kind of view they would if they removed <br />those trees. She stated that their property sits higher up than her property and that they <br />would be able to see the tank no matter where it was placed on her property. She <br />suggested that the neighbors plant the trees back so they would not have to view her <br />property from their property. She noted that the staff report included photos taken from <br />the interior and exterior of the house at 455 Sycamore Road that claimed that the property <br />owners could see the tank from the front door, the front window, and the front yard. She <br />stated that the front of that house originally faced Diamond Court and not her back yard, <br />but they had decided to reorient the entire layout of their house after they purchased their <br />house in 2005. She then made the correction that the neighbors can see the tank from the <br />side of their house, adding that they did not buy a view property but a home on a flag lot. <br />Ms. Rocha noted that staff's analysis was that the water tank met and exceeded the <br />development standards for the "A" zoning district. She added that people should expect <br />to see in an "A" district certain things that belong in a farm such as a water storage tank, <br />animals, and farm equipments, as opposed to living next to a park where one would see <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 9, 2008 Page 8 of 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.