PC 040908 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Decker also requested the Commission to make a determination on whether it prefers a wood or masonry retaining wall and if it desired to leave the review of the drainage and grading plan to the Building and Safety Division and the Engineering Department. Chair Blank suggested that a drainage and grading plan be required and that the retaining wall material be subject to the review and approval of the Building and Safety Division. He indicated that he was surprised by the amount of space desired by the applicant between the house and the pool and that he would like to see more of setback; however, he would support the ten -foot rear yard setback especially since the Bessos were amenable to it. He indicated that he agreed with the majority of the Commission with respect to a ten -foot setback for the hot tub. He noted that the decision would not make everyone happy but that this was part of trying to figure out the best way to work through this. Commissioner Pearce moved to recommend approval to the City Council of Case PUD- 99- 01 -05M, subject to the conditions of approval as listed in Exhibit B of the staff report with the modifications that Condition No. 3 include the language for Option 2 regarding reducing the side yard setback from ten feet to five feet and the rear yard setback from 20 feet to 10 feet and the addition of a condition that the applicant submit a drainage and grading plan prior to the issuance of a building permit. Ms. Decker proposed the following language for the new condition as follows: "The applicant shall submit a grading and drainage plan that provides detailed information regarding materials to be used to retain and provide positive drainage, subject to the review and approval of the Director of Planning and Community Development prior to the issuance of a building permit." Commissioner Fox seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Blank, Fox, Narum, Olson, and Pearce. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. RECUSED: None. ABSENT: None. Resolution No. PC- 2008 -17 recommending approval to the City Council of Case PUD- 99- 01 -05M was entered and adopted as motioned. Ms. Decker noted that as a major modification, this item would automatically come before the City Council and that no appeal was required. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 9, 2008 Page 28 of 33