Laserfiche WebLink
and that not all the people moving in would be working in San Francisco or using BART; <br /> some would be working in and around Pleasanton and would be driving their own <br /> vehicles. <br /> Ellen Gave stated that she has lived in Valencia for 12 years and likes living in the area <br /> because weekends are quiet as Hacienda is closed. She added that she understood <br /> building close to the BART station but questioned the need for three large apartment <br /> buildings with Archstone nearby. She stated that these are hard times and that the <br /> apartments would bring in different elements to the area. She indicated that she is <br /> being protective of her development and its residents and cited the existence of <br /> significant vandalism, including graffiti, after the dot.com bust near her development. <br /> She stated that she believed the City should spread out the units and not just locate <br /> them in Hacienda. <br /> Sunil Kulkarni stated that he enjoys taking his two -month old baby for walks on the <br /> vacant lots where it is quiet and safe and requested the City not to spoil the current <br /> family- oriented culture. He added that he does not go to the park right behind his house <br /> because it is crowded by residents of Archstone and Hacienda Commons. He noted <br /> that property values are decreasing and believes that low- income housing and <br /> apartment developments would further lower the values and further impact the City's <br /> high quality schools and parks and recreation with overcrowding. He indicated that <br /> adding more low- income units would not benefit Pleasanton because it would create <br /> more problems and have a negative impact on the low crime rate and the good <br /> neighborhood. He asked the Commission not to let low- income people come into <br /> Pleasanton. He added that the business park was meant for businesses and that the <br /> poor economy should not be a reason to sell the property for low- income residential <br /> development. <br /> Robert Desroches stated that he has worked at Zantaz in West Las Positas Boulevard <br /> for ten years and that 36 of its 300 employees that live in San Francisco do not take <br /> BART. He added that there is a bike rack at his workplace but only one employee bikes <br /> to work. He noted that he lives in the Valencia development, which is a ten minute walk <br /> to his workplace, but he drives to work. He stated that judging from his workplace, there <br /> is zero evidence to support the assertion that the units would contribute to the vitality of <br /> businesses. <br /> Mr. Desroches opposed adding 1,000 new units in the area. He stated that the number <br /> one reason people want to live in Pleasanton is the school system and expressed <br /> concerns about the negative impact these units would have on schools. He noted that <br /> there are no clear plans on how the school problems could be resolved and could not <br /> understand how this could be ignored. He indicated that he does not understand the <br /> ramifications of the litigation but questioned why all the units need to be built in <br /> Hacienda rather than locating some of them by the BART station near Stoneridge Mall. <br /> Ashok Moghe stated that he moved to Pleasanton three years ago because of its <br /> culture and peacefulness. He indicated that he felt the threat of litigation is being used <br /> DRAFT EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 9/23/2009 Page 3 of 18 <br />