My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
102009
>
12 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2009 11:21:06 AM
Creation date
10/14/2009 3:03:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/20/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
12 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hacienda Mixed Use Rezoning Initial Study <br /> Environmental Setting <br /> I -580, an eight -lane interstate freeway, is the northern boundary, Tassajara Creek to the Iron Horse Trail <br /> right -of -way to Arroyo Mocho is the eastern boundary, Arroyo Mocho is the southern boundary, and <br /> Hopyard Road is the western boundary of Hacienda. (See Figure 1, above.) The three sites are <br /> surrounded by Owens Drive (a four -lane road), Hacienda Drive (a four -lane road), Stoneridge Drive (a <br /> four -lane road) and Willow Road (a four -lane road). Gibraltar Drive (a two -lane road), is the boundary <br /> between the BRE site (Hacienda Site 7E) and the Roche Molecular Systems site (Hacienda Site 6). <br /> The Pleasanton /Dublin BART station is less than 1/2 mile due north of the three project sites. <br /> Significance Criteria <br /> The impact questions above constitute the significance criteria for this environmental topic. In addition, <br /> the project would result in a significant effect if it would: <br /> Result in a substantial increase in traffic that would cause the corridor or intersection level of <br /> service to drop during the peak hour below acceptable level of service (LOS) D, or if levels of <br /> service are already below D, a deterioration of 0.01 or more in volume -to- capacity (V /C) ratio. <br /> Discussion of Checklist Items <br /> Less than Significant Impacts. Development due to the proposed zone change may alter the land uses <br /> on the project sites from office and light industrial land -uses to residential and neighborhood serving <br /> retail land uses. As these proposed land uses would be located within '/z mile of a BART station, local <br /> automobile traffic due to the proposed project would be expected to differ from the currently permitted <br /> land uses on the site. A higher percentage of trips would be expected to be walking, bicycle, or transit <br /> trips, and vehicle traffic would be expected to travel the opposite direction of other traffic in the area. <br /> The EIR for the General Plan analyzed the Concentrated Residential Mixed Use Alternative which <br /> generally covers potential impacts of this proposed zone change. Although the EIR included an <br /> analysis using a reduced traffic generation rate to reflect the potential impact of a transit oriented <br /> development with potential residential units readily walkable to BART, this impact analysis was <br /> someone confounded by including additional commercial development on another site in this <br /> alternative. In any case, the analysis showed that all intersections (excluding downtown and gateway <br /> intersections) could be mitigated to LOS D and the needed improvements were included in the General <br /> Plan. At the time development plans are proposed for the project sites, this topic will be addressed in <br /> the environmental review document subject to the California Environmenta1QualityAct, and a new traffic <br /> analysis for the specific development proposed will be conducted. If any potentially significant effects <br /> were identified, then mitigation measures, such as those included in the EIR for the General Plan for the <br /> Concentrated Residential Mixed Use Alternative, would be included. On a program level, the impacts <br /> due to the zone change would be less than significant for the reasons stated above. <br /> No Impacts. The project would make no change to traffic patterns, would not change the design of <br /> existing arterial or collector roads, would not introduce incompatible vehicles (such as farm equipment) <br /> on the roadways, or cause conflicts with plans or policies supporting alterative transportation. The <br /> change to a mixed use designation on the three sites would support alternative transportation by <br /> providing for housing and neighborhood- serving retail uses with one half mile of a BART station. <br /> The zone change could lead to future development. At that time, the development plans would provide <br /> a design for emergency vehicle routes and Tor parking. This issue will be addressed in the <br /> Draft, Subject to Revision 25 8/31/2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.