Laserfiche WebLink
Hacienda Mixed Use Rezoning Initial Study <br /> Particulate Matter (PM 3.02 2.52 17 <br /> Carbon Monoxide (CO) 295.45 83.34 72 <br /> Carbon Dioxide (CO 21.19 28.1 33 <br /> Source: Illingworth Rodkin, using Emfac2007 V2.3 Nov. 2006, 2007. <br /> In 2005, ozone was the only pollutant for which the Bay Area was in non attainment. It is anticipated <br /> that in the future the Bay Area will be in non attainment for particulate matter. <br /> Because the proposed project is a zoning change, no construction would occur as a result of this project. <br /> At the time a development plan is considered for any of the three project sites, the City will conduct <br /> environmental analysis under CEQA to consider the potential for carbon monoxide, ozone, and <br /> particulate air quality impacts due to project construction and operation, and will identify mitigation <br /> measures, as warranted. The project site exceeds 4.0 acres. Thus an enhanced dust control program <br /> during construction would be applicable to development resulting from this project. <br /> Future development due to the zoning change may contain residential land uses, the closest of which <br /> would be about 500 feet from 1 -580. Thus any future residential development would be in compliance <br /> with the California Air Resources Board's Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health <br /> Perpective, April 2005 and with programs contained in the Air Quality Element of the General Plan. Air <br /> quality impacts due to nearby mobile sources on residential development would be less than significant. <br /> Table 1, above, shows that greenhouse gas emissions (carbon dioxide or CO will increase in Alameda <br /> County. Table 2, below, shows the expected increase of greenhouse gas emissions in the Planning Area <br /> in the future. Although the table below considered development from this project in the cumulative <br /> total, it did not consider the reduced traffic impacts of locating high- density housing close to the BART <br /> line. Such housing would help reduce vehicle trips and trip lengths in the future. This issue will be <br /> addressed in the environmental review documents at the time development plans are proposed for the <br /> project sites. <br /> TABLE 2: GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS <br /> Emission Source Existing Conditions (2005) Buildout (2025) <br /> (CO in MT/Year) all CO (CO in MT/Year) all CO <br /> Residential 0.277 21 0.319 16 <br /> Commercial /Office /R &D /Other 0.241 18 0.404 21 <br /> Industrial 0.043 3 0.082 4 <br /> Transportation 0.777 58 1.140 59 <br /> Total Annual Emissions 1.338 100 1.940 100 <br /> Notes: CO carbon dioxide, e equivalent, CO carbon dioxide equivalent, MT= million tons <br /> Source: LSA Associates, August 2008. <br /> See a discussion about toxic air contaminants in Section V. '7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials, below. <br /> Residential development resulting from the proposed zoning change would not generate objectionable <br /> odors; some automobile exhaust odors from on -site vehicles could be expected but would have a less <br /> th n siggruScant environmentaiiimpact. <br /> Draft, Subject to Revision 10 8/31/2009 <br />