My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
102009
>
12 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2009 11:21:06 AM
Creation date
10/14/2009 3:03:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/20/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
12 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br /> In April 2003 the City Council adopted a Housing Element which provided (in <br /> Program 19.1) that the City would complete land use studies to identify sites that could <br /> be converted from non residential to high density residential uses, and following those <br /> studies to modify the General Plan Land Use Element and rezone land sufficient to <br /> accommodate 871 multifamily residential units, which was the unmet portion of the <br /> City's regional housing allocation at that time. In March, 2005, the State Department of <br /> Housing and Community Development (HCD) decertified the City's Housing Element <br /> because these rezonings had not been accomplished. Three years ago, a nonprofit <br /> organization, Urban Habitat Program, filed litigation against the City claiming that <br /> various City policies and ordinances prevent or hinder the development of affordable <br /> housing in Pleasanton. Its allegations include that the City has failed to fully implement <br /> Program 19.1 of the 2003 Housing Element. <br /> In communications with HCD and in court documents related to the Urban Habitat <br /> litigation, the City has stated its intention to complete the rezonings as soon as possible <br /> following the adoption of the updated General Plan. Although Program 19.1 has been <br /> satisfied in part with the approval On October 2008) of the 350 -unit Windstar <br /> development at the new BART station, there remain 521 units to be accommodated <br /> under the 2003 Housing Element. In the meantime, the City has received its regional <br /> housing needs allocation for the next Housing Element which will require the City to <br /> plan for an additional 3,277 units, approximately 1,800 of which are to be affordable to <br /> very low- and low- income households. State housing law (Government Code, <br /> Section 65583.2(c)) requires that land counted towards the vacant lands inventory for <br /> housing for low and very -low income households be zoned for residential development <br /> at 30 units or more per acre. <br /> The transformation of Hacienda to a mixed use development integrated with the transit <br /> hub at the BART station was extensively discussed during the General Plan update <br /> process. In the General Plan adopted in July 2009, Hacienda is designated as Mixed <br /> Use /Business Park on the Land Use Map, and policies in the Land Use Element <br /> encourage the development of mixed use and residential densities that support <br /> affordable housing and transit. <br /> In August 2008, the City Council and the Planning Commission met in a Joint Workshop <br /> to discuss future planning options for the Hacienda area. At that meeting, the City <br /> Council directed the formation of a subcommittee to oversee a comprehensive PUD <br /> modification process, with extensive public input, that would identify a new vision for <br /> Hacienda, address park -wide planning objectives, and create modified development <br /> standards and design guidelines to be included in the individual site development <br /> proposals. This process will commence shortly and is likely to take approximately nine <br /> to twelve months. Because of the pending litigation, staff believes immediate action <br /> should be taken to complete the rezonings on the three identified sites now that the <br /> General Plan has been adopted, and that these rezonings which do not involve any <br /> Case No. PRZ -48., City of Pleasanton Planning Commission <br /> Page 2 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.