My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
102009
>
12 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2009 11:21:06 AM
Creation date
10/14/2009 3:03:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/20/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
12 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
He noted that the City could consider a greater number to be a bigger benefit, but the <br /> framework is not for 100 percent affordability. He further noted that such a project <br /> requires millions of dollars of subsidy, which will not happen. <br /> Referring to the Negative Declaration and the school impact, Commissioner Narum <br /> inquired if the City had an idea of how many additional children the project expects to <br /> generate. <br /> Ms. Stern replied that during the General Plan analysis, staff had a conversation with <br /> the School District about all of the alternatives for the General Plan Land Use, one of <br /> which included putting 1,271 units in the Business Park. She stated that the District <br /> expressed concerns and wanted to decide for itself if it would need any additional <br /> facilities as a result of this. She added that in terms of what could be generated, staff <br /> received information from the school demographer on the different types of housing, <br /> and for multi family housing at that density, it is relatively low, about 1/3 of what is <br /> generated in single family homes on larger lots. <br /> Commissioner Narum inquired whether, if the school demographer were to say there <br /> are 1.2 children per average household in a high- density household versus 2.1 in a <br /> single family home, there would be a process whereby the City might actually have to <br /> survey the existing environments in Valencia and other developments and indicate that <br /> it may be true based upon the origin of the demographic data, which is about 8 -9 years <br /> old. She noted that the reality is that in today's environment, there are families with two <br /> to three children in high- density housing. <br /> Ms. Stern stated that the School District demographic study is extensive, accurate, and <br /> conducted yearly. She noted that School officials meet with City staff about the number <br /> of units moving forward, and the District has generation surveys from developments in <br /> town. <br /> Mr. Dolan indicated that data is possibly gathered based on kids going to school and <br /> where they live, which is accurate. <br /> Ms. Stern agreed. She added that the figure was about .4 children per higher- density <br /> household. <br /> Commissioner Narum stated that .4 children would be almost 400 children. She <br /> indicated that she had a problem with a "less than significant" impact. <br /> Ms. Stern clarified that the numbers are distributed from Kindergarten through 12 <br /> grade. <br /> Commissioner Narum referred to page 23, Section 14. Recreation, of the Negative <br /> Declaration, and stated that there are not enough parks in or near the property for the <br /> 400 children that would be generated. She added that the Creekside Park gets a lot of <br /> DRAFT EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 9/23/2009 Page 10 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.