My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
102009
>
12 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2009 11:21:06 AM
Creation date
10/14/2009 3:03:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/20/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
12 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
her employer, and for ownership and pride. She indicated that high rises do not belong <br /> in town and that this type of development would decrease house values. She <br /> expressed concern about safety and escalating crime in the area, stating that people no <br /> longer ride their bikes or walk along the trail between Sienna and Valencia <br /> developments and the apartment complex because a man was recently held at gunpoint <br /> along that trail and his wallet taken. She stated that bringing in an additional 1,100 units <br /> of low income near the BART station is an added invitation for more family members <br /> and friends to visit. She urged the Commission to keep Pleasanton safe. <br /> Chaitali Wagh, a senior at Foothill High School, stated that her family moved from <br /> Walnut Creek to the Sienna neighborhood last year because they found it to be a safe <br /> environment where they can go out at night without being afraid. She echoed the <br /> comments of speakers and noted that her school's class size has increased from 35 to <br /> 45 students. She stated that some students in her English and History classes sit on <br /> the floor because there are not enough desks due to budget cuts. She added that more <br /> houses will bring in more students, which would mean a greater ratio between students <br /> and counselors who are needed to discuss college plans. <br /> Debora Sanders stated that she moved to Valencia in 2007 and that she agrees with <br /> the comments of earlier speakers. She indicated that she attended the neighborhood <br /> meeting a week ago to learn about the plans. She noted that because only eight <br /> residents attended the workshop, she walked the Valencia neighborhood and informed <br /> the residents, a majority of whom were unaware of the rezonings proposed. She stated <br /> that she understood that growth needs to take place; however, the residents need <br /> opportunities other than staff reports to understand the impacts this rezoning will have <br /> on them. She reiterated the concern that the joint task force has not been set up. <br /> Shaivali Parekh, a senior at Foothill High School, stated that there are not enough <br /> desks for students in some classrooms because the class sizes have increased from <br /> 35 to 45 students, and teachers are not able to pay attention to students. She indicated <br /> that she and her family moved to Pleasanton from Fremont a year and a half ago and <br /> that she likes living in Pleasanton and wants to raise her children here. She added that <br /> her grades have also improved since she moved to Pleasanton. She stated not <br /> everyone who lives in Pleasanton works in Pleasanton and that the BART station <br /> argument was not a valid reason to build more apartments. <br /> Makarand Walimbe stated that Pleasanton is a fabulous city and that he has been lived <br /> here for seven years. He concurred with the comments made by earlier speakers and <br /> disagreed that additional housing would create a better Business Park. He indicated <br /> that he felt more housing will tax the local resources such as police, hospitals, schools, <br /> and water. He added that Valley Care Hospital and schools are already crowded, and <br /> that there will be more pollution and safety concerns. He asked that the Commission to <br /> reconsider the proposal and questioned if bringing this to the Commissioners' <br /> neighborhood would be acceptable to them. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 9/23/2009 Page 6 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.