My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ORD 1246
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
ORDINANCES
>
1201 - 1300
>
ORD 1246
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2004 10:09:05 AM
Creation date
3/17/1999 4:56:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
ORDINANCES
DOCUMENT NO
ORD 1246
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
unnecessary because the mitigation measures which <br /> have been incorporated into the Project <br /> substantially lessen the effect. <br /> <br /> c.4 Fact. See Section XII (infeasibility of <br /> alternatives) and Section V (Noise Mitigation). <br /> <br />D. Significant Effect. Increased pressure for development <br /> on transitional commercial areas to the east of the <br /> Project in the vicinity of Old Santa Rita Road. <br /> <br /> d.1 Finding. Private and/or public redevelopment and <br /> packaging of parcels can lessen the effect. <br /> <br /> d.2 Fact. City zoning regulations and design review <br /> procedures require development complementary to its <br /> surroundings. Large, developable parcels have been <br /> created through private packaging of marginal-sized <br /> parcels. <br /> <br /> d.3 Finding. The No Project Alternative, which could <br /> partially mitigate the significant effect, is <br /> infeasible. <br /> <br /> d.4 Fact. See Section XII (infeasibility of the No <br /> Project Alternative)- <br /> <br />E. Significant Effect. Demand for higher densities and <br /> development multiple-family residential lands to the <br /> east of the Project. <br /> <br /> e.1 Finding. Local zoning and growth management <br /> procedures will substantially lessen significant <br /> effects. <br /> <br /> e.2 Fact. Rezoning and a General Plan Amendment <br /> allowing for higher density on a case-by-case basis <br /> will lessen the housing demand and will reduce the <br /> overall demand. <br /> <br /> e.3 Finding. Local housing economics will not support <br /> densities greater than presently allowed. <br /> <br /> e.4 Fact. Developers have refused City offered higher <br /> densities, preferring to build at traditional <br /> suburban apartment densities. <br /> <br /> e.5 Finding- The No Project Alternative, which could <br /> partially mitigate the significant effect, is <br /> infeasible. <br /> <br /> e.6 Fact. See Section XII (infeasibility of the No <br /> Project Alternative). <br /> <br /> - 2 - <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.