My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 090909
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
PC 090909
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:41:11 PM
Creation date
9/23/2009 9:32:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/9/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chris Studzinski stated that he is a property and business owner on Quarry Lane and <br />expressed concern regarding allowing a non-industrial use in Valley Business Park. He <br />noted that there are two driveways on the sides of the building but that they do not <br />continue all the way around. He added that he foresees problems with parking on other <br />tenants’ property and cut-through to planted areas. He indicated that he was <br />concerned with losing his business and suggested that the recreational facility be <br />moved to the Vintage Hills Shopping Center or Downtown. <br />Commissioner Olson asked Mr. Studzinski what type of business he had. <br />Mr. Studzinski replied that he has a machine shop and has run it for 22 years, and that <br />he has been a Pleasanton resident for 28 years. He noted that his business deals with <br />parts for semi-conductors, telecommunications, precision machinery, etc., all <br />computerized. He added that his business is clean and that the Fire Department has <br />inspected it. He indicated that he provides health care for his 15 full-time employees <br />from day one, that his business contributes to the City, and that he pays his taxes. <br />Commissioner Olson asked Mr. Studzinski if his employees have ample parking on his <br />property and why he was concerned about losing his business. <br />Mr. Studzinski replied that his employees have sufficient parking on his property. With <br />respect to losing his business, he stated that he was concerned that the increasing <br />number of non-industrial uses the City allows in the Business Park would crowd him out <br />and that he will incur problems with his insurance company due to the eventual majority <br />of non-industrial operations in a Business Park. He added that he did not want to be a <br />hold-out like the business behind the Round Table Pizza parking lot. He reiterated that <br />he believes there are better locations for such uses. <br />Mr. Studzinski cited traffic and parking issues, noting that his CC&R’s do not allow for <br />on-street parking and that when the piano lesson facility was approved, the Commission <br />encouraged parking on the street. He stated that he thinks things are incrementally <br />changing and this deviates from the intentions of the seven partners who established <br />the Business Park. <br />Commissioner O’Connor stated that there are permitted uses and conditionally <br />permitted uses. Referring to Mr. Studzinski’s statement that the CC&R’s for Valley <br />Business Park do not allow on-street parking, he inquired if the CC&R’s specifically <br />prohibit this type of uses in the Park. <br />Mr. Studzinski replied that the CC&R’s only identifies allowed uses. <br />Commissioner O’Connor inquired if recreational facilities are not allowed, even <br />conditionally. <br />Mr. Studzinski read from the list of allowed uses, which included day care center [not <br />pre-school or school], gymnasium or health club [such as 24-Hour Fitness, not <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 9, 2009 Page 6 of 16 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.