My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 090909
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
PC 090909
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:41:11 PM
Creation date
9/23/2009 9:32:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/9/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
may wish to consider breeding, sales, and transfer of animals as a prohibited home <br />occupation. <br />Recalling the chicken issue which occurred four or five years ago, Commissioner Blank <br />stated that there may be instances where dogs have a litter of 15 pups, and he inquired <br />if this is something that should be considered. He indicated that he felt some research <br />might need to be done as opposed to simply banning certain uses. He asked staff <br />whether or not there have been other issues in the past other than the hawk and <br />chicken issues. <br />Ms. Decker replied that staff has received complaints on the existing kennel out in the <br />Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan area, which was a pre-existing use, prior to the <br />Council adoption of the Specific Plan. She indicated that staff does not run into these <br />types of problems often, but should it become a topic to consider, staff can add it in the <br />future and also review language in the R district of Chapter 7 in terms of what is actually <br />allowed as far as animals are concerned. <br />Chair Pearce inquired whether, by its nature, such a breeding operation should be <br />prohibited and if there were a situation where it might be non-exempt. <br />Ms. Decker replied that in some communities, people are allowed to breed dogs and <br />sell the puppies from their homes. She indicated, however, that she was not aware if <br />this happens in Pleasanton. She noted that there were so many variables and was not <br />sure how to craft language. She added that if this is an area of concern for the <br />Commission, staff could bring information back. <br />Commissioner Blank suggested that staff bring back additional data about how often <br />this has come up, as he prefers not to have to solve a problem that does not exist. <br />Commissioner Olson noted a typographical error in the first sentence of the first full <br />paragraph on page 3 and requested that the work “within” be deleted. <br />Commissioner Blank inquired what “tole painting” was. <br />Commissioner O’Connor explained that this is doing craft painting on objects such as a <br />water can. <br />Commissioner Pentin agreed with adding language that includes a personal computer <br />and inquired whether web designers or graphic artists would be exempt or not. <br />Ms. Decker replied that these would be exempt because the intent for exempt home <br />occupations is similar to office uses where employees are not coming to and going from <br />the house. She added that if a business that had an office and a web designer requests <br />to have two designers and two computers with people coming and going, this would be <br />considered non-exempt. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 9, 2009 Page 12 of 16 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.