My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 062409
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
PC 062409
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:40:41 PM
Creation date
9/23/2009 9:18:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/24/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
did not present any significant analysis to the Commission concerning what impacts the <br />project may have on infrastructure, which are the factors that give rise to how much <br />should count toward the housing cap. He added that notwithstanding that analysis, staff <br />would pass along to the City Council whatever the Commission recommends in terms of <br />whether none, some, or all units count toward the housing cap. <br />Commissioner O’Connor noted Ms. Giffin’s statement that the trees that will be planted <br />to buffer neighboring properties with no view in-between at maturity and inquired what <br />the maturity dates of those trees might be. He further inquired if there would be more <br />than one tree type. <br />Ms. Giffin replied that she did not know the maturity dates for the trees. She noted that <br />the recommended conditions of approval are written such that a licensed landscape <br />architect would have to review this and provide information to staff prior to issuance of a <br />building permit. With respect to the types of screen trees between CLC and Hendrick’s <br />site, Ms. Giffin stated that staff is recommending the Deodora Cedrus, which are <br />evergreen and drought-tolerant and would grow to about 80 feet in height and its <br />canopy would be 40 feet in diameter. <br />Commissioner O’Connor noted that it seemed like the entire Staples Ranch property is <br />in the 100-year flood plain. <br />Ms. Giffin confirmed that was correct. She stated that as part of the City of Livermore’s <br />El Charro Specific Plan project, the Staples Ranch property will be removed from the <br />flood plain by implementing flood improvements on the Specific Plan property. She <br />added that a number of improvements are planned to be constructed later this year or <br />early next year and that the entire site will need to be taken out of the flood plain for <br />construction on Staples Ranch to be completed and occupied. <br />Commissioner O’Connor inquired if the City was prevented from doing anything prior to <br />the property being removed from the 100-year flood plain. <br />Ms. Giffin replied that the site cannot be occupied until it is removed from the flood plain <br />and construction occurs in the El Charro Specific Plan area. <br />Commissioner O’Connor inquired if this referred to the entire property or just the <br />residential portion. <br />Ms. Giffin clarified that the law applies to the residential portion. She added that the EIR <br />mitigation measure does require the entire site to be brought out of the flood plain and <br />that there is an agreement addressing improvements done within the Livermore <br />property, which is part of the Pre-Development and Cooperation Agreement between <br />the City of Pleasanton, Alameda County, and the City of Livermore. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 24, 2009 Page 11 of 22 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.