Laserfiche WebLink
Chair Pearce stated that staff could walk the applicants through the process. <br />Ms. Decker added that staff can also include in the process an acknowledgement that <br />the developers can sign stating that they are aware of the risk and that if there are <br />changes to the PUD development plan, they will need to modify their Tentative Map and <br />other documents accordingly to match the approval of the PUD development plan. <br />Commissioners Blank moved to find that the adoption of proposed amendments <br />to the Municipal Code are statutorily exempt from the California Environmental <br />Quality Act and to recommend approval to the City Council of PRZ-41 as shown <br />in Exhibits A and B, with a condition that the developers sign an <br />acknowledgement that they will have to make any changes to their Tentative <br />Plans if there are revisions to the PUD development plan at the time of City <br />Council approval. <br />Commissioner Narum seconded the motion. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, Narum, Pearce, and Pentin. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: Commissioners O’Connor and Olson. <br />Resolution No. PC-2009-27 recommending approval of PRZ-41 was entered and <br />adopted as motioned. <br />7. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW/ACTION <br />a.Future Planning Calendar <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />b.Actions of the City Council <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />c.Actions of the Zoning Administrator <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 12, 2009 Page 22 of 23 <br /> <br />