My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 081209
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
PC 081209
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:41:01 PM
Creation date
9/23/2009 8:55:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/12/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Julie Harryman agreed with Commissioner Blank’s statement. She clarified, however, <br />that the question was whether or not it was mandatory, and it is not mandatory because <br />the sections do not apply since they are not asking for an exception to the noise <br />ordinance. <br />Commissioner Blank requested clarification that the Commission could place a time limit <br />on a CUP. <br />Ms. Harryman replied that was correct. <br />Commissioner Pentin noted that one speaker stated there were a number of citations, <br />and the staff report indicates that there were complaints but only one actual citation. <br />Mr. Otto confirmed that staff was only aware that one citation was issued. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that he has some baggage on both sides of the equation: <br />one side is that when one does move into a Downtown, there is a certain amount of <br />baggage that comes with it, similar to those who buy houses near airports and then <br />complain about the noise generated by airplanes; and on the other hand, he questioned <br />where it rises above the level of reasonability. He noted that some of the tools he <br />thought the Commission may want to think about is enforceability, ensuring that the City <br />does not look down the road with regret, limiting the number of days music is allowed to <br />five or six days, but not to a specific day to allow flexibility. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that he believes TIPS should be done, and with respect to <br />monitoring, he stated that he does not want to micro-manage but thinks one of the <br />things the Commission could require is a monitoring device that would record decibel <br />levels on a paper graph, as directed by the Director of Community Development. He <br />noted that it appears the only time in question would be from 9:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.; <br />the recording could be done at random, and if it does not exceed 70 decibels, then there <br />is no issue, but if it does, the applicant would can be given an opportunity to mitigate the <br />problem and return to the Planning Commission. <br />Commissioner Narum stated that the point of taking the readings is that she did not <br />want to create work for the Police Department, so if there is a problem, the Barones can <br />immediately react to it and alert the band. She indicated that she would also like to see <br />staff work with the Barones to record the decibel reading so there is a record to <br />document what was done in case of any complaints. <br />Commissioner Blank ask staff if a condition could be crafted along the lines of what <br />Commissioners Narum and he are proposing. <br />Ms. Decker replied that staff could do that. <br />Commissioner Pentin stated that there could be a problem with neighbors arguing that <br />the noise level is 72 decibels at one house and 68 decibels at Barone’s, which could still <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 12, 2009 Page 16 of 23 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.