PC 041509 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Rondash stated that the reason the condition was not included is because the function of this establishment is to sell and provide wine and that samplings were an addition or ancillary offering; therefore, staff did not approach the request in the same way it is handled for bar-type restaurants. Chair Pearce inquired whether or not the condition is based on the amount of alcohol served as opposed to the mere fact that alcohol is being served. Ms. Rondash replied that its use as a wine-tasting room is what was considered. Mr. Dolan explained that if the primary purpose is to taste wine so that one might buy bottles of it, one is less likely to drink as much, although there is the opportunity to have several glasses of wine. He added that it would not be unreasonable to apply a similar condition with the understanding that the winery does not provide a full menu but that food will be made available at all times. Commissioner O’Connor pointed out that because there is outside seating, it could be assumed that if one tasted wine and bought a bottle, that person could go outside, sit, and open the bottle. Mr. Dolan confirmed that was a possibility. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Sandi Bohner and William Webster, applicants, approached the podium. Ms. Bohner stated that she and her husband are in the Livermore Valley Wine Appellation and have tasting rooms in Sunol and Livermore. She noted that they provide one-ounce pours as it is a wine-tasting room rather than a wine bar and that they also make restrooms available to the public. She added that they will be having refrigeration equipment for white and rose wines that need to be chilled. Mr. Webster stated they have been in the wine business for about nine years in the Livermore Valley. He noted that he and his wife has been involved in the food service business in Pleasanton since the early 1980’s with five cafes. She added that they are fairly well-known to and liked by the community and that they have a good public following. Mr. Webster referred to Condition No. 2 and stated that they believe it is appropriate to have limits on hours. He indicated that they initially suggested a nominal start from 12:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Friday, Saturday, and Sunday; however, they would like to extend it to 10:00 p.m. because they have small private events at times, such as the First Wednesdays and Wine Strolls.He noted that they understand that other businesses have more retail-oriented hours like the Wine Steward, and they would like to adjust their hours given the public’s interest and traffic.He requested that the six-month period condition be removed and they be allowed to be open from PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 15, 2009 Page 18 of 24