PC 081308 - Laserfiche WebLink

open space dedicated to the City which were kept pristine. He noted that staff allowed and supported re-forestation to take place with oak, bay, or laurel trees. Chair Blank inquired whether would there be an issue using a conditional use process to allow other uses without a formal modification of a PUD. Mr. Pavan replied that staff would support this request as appropriate. Commissioner Olson stated that he was in favor of grapes but that his sense from the discussion was that the Commission did not want to see grapes along that section of Foothill Road. He noted that the sloped areas up the hill are great for grapes, and he voiced concern with restricting this. Commissioner O’Connor stated that the Commission’s biggest concern was having a lot of accessory buildings and filling the open space up with structures. Commissioner Narum stated that vineyards were not consistent with everything else along Foothill Road, but she would not object if any lots wanted to plant some grapes within their building envelope as part of their landscape, similar to a property to the south. Commissioner Pearce suggested the Commission provide a mechanism for these applications to come back to the Commission for consideration. Chair Blank agreed. Commissioner O’Connor stated that he was more concerned about having horses. Chair Blank stated that he believed the PUD process was an administrative burden, and he agreed with providing a mechanism for a CUP. Mr. Pavan suggested modifying the condition to allow appropriate agricultural uses, subject to CUP review and approval. Ms. Decker noted that it appeared the Commission’s intent is to allow agricultural uses and orchards but not necessarily heavy vineyard growth that would take away the natural landscape. She added that staff can craft the condition to state this; however, she expressed concerned about an application to put in five fruit trees having to come back to the Commission for approval. With respect to the bond, Commissioner Olson stated that it appears that the applicants must put up a bond prior to knowing whether or not the three permits are obtainable. He questioned if this was reasonable and suggested providing a bond when there is evidence that the permits are issuable. Mr. Dolan said it is important to recognize that in a typical approach, a project would not even have this opportunity. He noted that all these requirements normally need to be completed up front, and staff has put together an opportunity to move forward without completing the required improvements. He added that staff has a fair amount of confidence that these permits are obtainable because the area is not a PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 13, 2008 Page 17 of 26