My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
07 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
091509
>
07 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2009 9:48:20 AM
Creation date
9/11/2009 9:48:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/15/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
07 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 3 <br /> DRAFT <br /> PDAM -2, Ken and Pamela Chrisman <br /> Application to extend the Development Agreement for five years for the property <br /> located at 1944 Three Oaks Drive (formerly 1944 Vineyard Avenue), in the <br /> Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan Area. Zoning for the property is PUD -LDR <br /> (Planned Unit Development Low Density Residential) District. <br /> There was no staff presentation. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> Mary Roberts stated that she was initially concerned with the staff report for July 22, <br /> 2009 and thanked staff for amending it. She indicated that she is sympathetic for what <br /> the Chrisman's are trying to do and added that the staff report now indicates that the <br /> payment for the Specific Plan will follow the five -year increase for the extension. She <br /> noted, however, that she did not believe this was a major project to move forward with <br /> and that nothing is currently happening on the property. She stated that the 14 lots <br /> have been sitting for over a year due to the economy. She voiced concern with <br /> precedent- setting, such as with the Lin property. <br /> Frank Berlogar expressed support for the Chrismans' application. He cited the harsh <br /> economic crisis and urged the Commission's support for an extension on their <br /> development agreement. With respect to the Lin's property, he stated that he believed <br /> the Council and the Commission will be able to address the bridge. <br /> Commissioner Blank disclosed that he knows Mr. Berlogar personally but has not <br /> discussed the matter with him. <br /> Jim Happ, applicant, clarified that contrary to what Ms. Roberts indicated in her letter <br /> that the Chrismans had not contributed anything to the City, the Chrismans had, in fact, <br /> paid a full share of the design cost for the new Vineyard Avenue and the Vineyard Trail, <br /> and had dedicated the right -of -way. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> Commissioner Blank moved to recommend approval to the City Council of the <br /> extension of the development agreement between the City and the Chrismans, <br /> subject to the condition that the Chrismans pay the specific plan preparation fee <br /> when the Final Map is submitted for approval. <br /> Commissioner Narum seconded the motion. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 8/12/2009 Page 1 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.