My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
07 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
091509
>
07 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2009 9:48:20 AM
Creation date
9/11/2009 9:48:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/15/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
07 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ANALYSIS <br /> Because the current Development Agreement will expire on September 23, 2012, the <br /> applicants request a five -year extension of the Development Agreement to September 23, <br /> 2017. With such an extension, the development rights and responsibilities described in the <br /> original Development Agreement (Exhibit A) as amended by the subsequent design change, <br /> would remain in effect during this extended period. <br /> The underlying planned unit development, as modified by the 2006 design change, remains <br /> consistent with the current General Plan and Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan. For the <br /> approved project, no grading is required in areas with a 25% or greater natural slope, as the <br /> slope on the north -east portion of the property was created during the construction of Old <br /> Vineyard Avenue, and this berm's slope appears to be slightly less than 25 A small area of <br /> the project's roadway does cross a slope that appears to be 25% or greater, but this overlaps <br /> the existing roadway providing access to existing development the Chrisman's current home. <br /> Thus, the proposed extension is consistent with the current General Plan. The project is a low <br /> density residential development as allowed by the Specific Plan. The Chrismans' earlier <br /> agreement on area -wide infrastructure improvements and financing facilitated timely <br /> development of the Vineyard Corridor. <br /> One condition that City staff proposes to impose on this request for extension is that the <br /> Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan Preparation Fee (covering costs of the City in <br /> preparing the Specific Plan, Environmental Impact Report, and supporting economic analysis <br /> reports [see pg. 109, paragraph 6, of the Specific Plan]) still be levied on the project when a <br /> final subdivision map is submitted for approval. Under the current terms of the Vineyard <br /> Avenue Corridor Specific Plan, such Specific Plan Preparation Fee is payable for 15 years <br /> after the City's 1999 adoption of the Specific Plan (effectively 2014). However, with the <br /> proposed extension of the Development Agreement, the Chrismans could delay the filing of a <br /> final map until 2017. City staff therefore recommends that this Specific Plan Preparation Fee <br /> still be collected, as this results in the Chrismans still fulfilling their existing obligations. In any <br /> event, the payment of other Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan fees does not expire after <br /> 15 years (or at all). <br /> Because of the current challenging economic climate, staff supports the request for the <br /> extension and recommends that the Planning Commission provide a positive recommendation <br /> to the City Council. <br /> PUBLIC NOTICE <br /> Notice was mailed to all property owners and residents within a 1,000 -foot radius of the project <br /> site. Mary Roberts contacted staff, expressing her objection to the extension as she did not <br /> believe there would be any benefits to the City to extend the Development Agreement. <br /> Case No. PDAM -02 Planning Commission <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.