Laserfiche WebLink
CR *(m) CR *(p) CN CC CS CF CA <br /> ..hi u bje ct to t h e <br /> f c ow i ng con s: <br /> said -use <br /> The st ei no ._,i <br /> ANALYSIS <br /> This amendment is intended to: <br /> (1) provide language that references Chapter 6.24 for purposes of regulating the <br /> operation of massage establishments; and <br /> (2) clarify existing code language. <br /> Operation of Massage Establishments <br /> Language proposed to be removed from Title 18 includes that which makes reference to <br /> the overall operation of massage establishments. Chapter 6.24 has been amended to <br /> reflect current State Government code updates for massage establishment practices. <br /> Since Title 18 dictates the land use designations where massage establishments are <br /> permitted, language referring to the operation of massage establishments (i.e. business <br /> hours) is proposed to be removed and a reference to Chapter 6.24 has been provided <br /> instead. <br /> Clarify Existing Code Language <br /> The language proposed above does not change the intent of current code requirements <br /> but instead simplifies it. For example, the number of technicians that may provide <br /> massage services is currently limited to three at any one time. If a business operator <br /> would like to provide services of four or more massage technicians at any one time, <br /> then a Conditional Use Permit is required. With this update, this number of massage <br /> technicians permitted at one time without approval of a Conditional Use Permit does not <br /> change. Thus that limitation will still be three; however the language describing this <br /> limitation has been made more clear. <br /> PRZ -43, City of Pleasanton Planning Commission <br /> Page 6 of 7 <br />