My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
090109
>
14 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2009 12:51:09 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 12:51:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/1/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
14 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
properties and the City in general. As with any use permit, this use can be suspended or <br /> revoked if the conditions are not met. As conditioned, the proposed modification to the <br /> existing use permit would comply with all applicable provisions of the Zoning <br /> Ordinance. Therefore, staff believes this finding can be made. <br /> VII. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> Projects of this nature are categorically exempt (Section 15301, Existing Facilities, Class 1) <br /> from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Therefore, no <br /> environmental document accompanies this report. <br /> VIII. CONCLUSION <br /> The application raises the question of the appropriate interface between businesses and <br /> residences in the Downtown, and staff and the PDA believe that the applicants' proposed <br /> outdoor music and entertainment request will be a benefit to the Downtown and that businesses <br /> on or near Main Street should be allowed to conduct late -night activities as long as they operate <br /> in a manner which respects the nearby residents. While the nearby residents are entitled to <br /> reasonable enjoyment of their property, their location near the Downtown commercial district <br /> means they are exposed to a greater degree of spillover impacts such as traffic, parking, noise, <br /> etc. than a typical residential neighborhood. The City tries to minimize these impacts, but at <br /> times some impacts at the residential /commercial interface are difficult to avoid, and it may not <br /> be realistic for residents in or near the Downtown to expect the same level of peace and quiet as <br /> those who live further from Downtown. With the current application, staff believes that the <br /> applicants' proposal as conditioned will be a benefit to the Downtown and that measures are in <br /> place to protect the surrounding uses from unreasonable impacts. <br /> IX. STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> Staff recommends that the Commission approve Case PCUP -249 by taking the following <br /> actions: <br /> 1) Make the conditional use findings as listed in the staff report; and <br /> 2) Approve Case PCUP -249 subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A. <br /> Alternative Action: <br /> Should the Commission believe that additional measures are required beyond the enforcement of <br /> the Municipal Code and staff's recommended conditions to address the concerns of residential <br /> neighbors, staff recommends that the Commission consider further restricting the hours when <br /> music is allowed or restricting the hours of amplified. music. <br /> Page 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.