My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
090109
>
14 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2009 12:51:09 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 12:51:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/1/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
14 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> Mr. Otto replied that the comment refers to exemptions from the noise ordinance for <br /> limited periods of time for CUPs. He added that CUPs do not have a time limit and run <br /> with the land. <br /> Commissioner Blank stated that in the past, the Commission had received the opinion <br /> [from the City Attorney's Office] that a time limit can be imposed on a CUP and that a <br /> CUP can be made to expire even though it runs with the land. <br /> Julie Harryman agreed with Commissioner Blank's statement. She clarified, however, <br /> that the question was whether or not it was mandatory, and it is not mandatory because <br /> the sections do not apply since they are not asking for an exception to the noise <br /> ordinance. <br /> Commissioner Blank requested clarification that the Commission could place a time limit <br /> on a CUP. <br /> Ms. Harryman replied that was correct. <br /> Commissioner Pentin noted that one speaker stated there were a number of citations, <br /> and the staff report indicates that there were complaints but only one actual citation. <br /> Mr. Otto confirmed that staff was only aware that one citation was issued. <br /> Commissioner Blank stated that he has some baggage on both sides of the equation: <br /> one side is that when one does move into a Downtown, there is a certain amount of <br /> baggage that comes with it, similar to those who buy houses near airports and then <br /> complain about the noise generated by airplanes; and on the other hand, he questioned <br /> where it rises above the level of reasonability. He noted that some of the tools he <br /> thought the Commission may want to think about is enforceability, ensuring that the City <br /> does not look down the road with regret, limiting the number of days music is allowed to <br /> five or six days, but not to a specific day to allow flexibility. <br /> Commissioner Blank stated that he believes TIPS should be done, and with respect to <br /> monitoring, he stated that he does not want to micro manage but thinks one of the <br /> things the Commission could require is a monitoring device that would record decibel <br /> levels on a paper graph, as directed by the Director of Community Development. He <br /> noted that it appears the only time in question would be from 9:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.; <br /> the recording could be done at random, and if it does not exceed 70 decibels, then there <br /> is no issue, but if it does, the applicant would can be given an opportunity to mitigate the <br /> problem and return to the Planning Commission. <br /> Commissioner Narum stated that the point of taking the readings is that she did not <br /> want to create work for the Police Department, so if there is a problem, the Barones can <br /> immediately react to it and alert the band. She indicated that she would also like to see <br /> staff work with the Barones to record the decibel reading so there is a record to <br /> document what was done in case of any complaints. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 8/12/2009 Page 13 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.