My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 09314
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
RES 09314
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2009 4:35:47 PM
Creation date
8/19/2009 4:35:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/21/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
RES 09314
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2005 Pleasanton Plan 2025 DRAFT 2.0 Land Use Element <br /> definitions in Measures PP and QQ will be applied in conjunction with 2001. At this rate, and including the addition of a small number of <br /> the definitions from the US Census Bureau, State law, and informa- second units each year, Pleasanton would reach a population of <br /> tion submitted by Measure PP petitioners into the public record. about 78,200 in the Planning fanning Area in the year 2025. <br /> In the future, Pleasanton is projected to grow to hold a maxim of These projections depend on many factors including the national and <br /> 29,000 homes. This number assumes buildout of all residential lands local economies, Tri-Valley job growth, household size, average <br /> shown on the General Plan Map at average densities (see Table 2 -3) vacancy rate, commute patterns, water supply, wastewater treatment <br /> or consistent with an adopted Specific Plan where applicable. The capacity, traffic capacity, air quality, and other factors. <br /> City's Growth Management Program <br /> currently limit, subject to certain exceptions for qualifi3ed Growth Management Program <br /> affordable housing projects, annual housing growth to 350 units, <br /> although actual growth has averaged around 250 units per year since The City designed to o regulate late e the location its first growth management ordinance in 1978, <br /> cation and rate of new residential growth <br /> TABLE 2 -3: GENERAL PLAN DENSITIES in a period of sewage treatment constraints and air quality concerns. <br /> The growth management program was modified following the <br /> Land Use Designation Allowable Average Density used comprehensive revisions to the General Plan in 1986 and 1996. <br /> Density Range for Holding Capacity Currently the Growth Management Ordinance: <br /> Rural Density Residential 0 0.2 du /acre 0.2 du /acre <br /> Low Density Residential 0 du /acre 1.0 du /acre Establishes an annual limit for new residential units. <br /> Medium Density Residential 2 du /acre 5.0 du /acre Requires the apportionment of yearly total new residential units <br /> High Density Residential 8+ du /acre 15.0 du /acre TO categories of projects (Le., affordable projects; major <br /> Mixed Use: Residential 20+ du /acre Not Applicable projects; first -come, first- served projects; small projects). <br /> Commercial 0 150% FAR Defines a process for obtaining an allocation under the program <br /> Commercial /Office 0 60 FAR' 35 FAR In recent years, as fewer large residential development sites are <br /> General Limited Industrial 0 50% FAR 31 FAR available and the number of residential units seeking building permits <br /> Business Park 0 60% FAR 32% FAR is significantly lower than the annual allocation, (tcduccd in 2004 to <br /> Sand and Gravel Harvesting Not Applicable Not applicable 3 S 0 `eta there has been less need for a growth management <br /> Notes: du dwelling unit(s), FAR floor area ratio system that acts to meter residential development. In the future, it is <br /> This will be based on a planned unit development (PUD) or Specific Plan, as anticipated that the overall residential growth rate will decrease as the <br /> either may be amended from time to time, subject to the 150 percent number of units approaches the 29,000 unit cap (see below). <br /> maximum FAR.. However, there may be years when large -scale multifamily or mixed <br /> An FAR of up to 300 percent is allowed in the Downtown Specific Plan area. use projects near the BART stations or in East Plegsanton compete <br /> Source: Community Development Department, 2008. with smaller projects for residential allocations. In addition, there is <br /> 2 LU element pan 4 <br /> 2 -16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.