Laserfiche WebLink
The property owner shall file a report on the economic impact of conversion <br /> upon the residents and shall make a copy of the report available to each <br /> resident at least 15 days prior to the hearing. <br /> In converting the Park to resident ownership, Section 66427.5 requires the property <br /> owner to avoid the economic displacement of all non purchasing residents. This is <br /> accomplished in a number of different ways: offering each resident the option to <br /> purchase his /her lot (i.e., condominium unit) or continuing residency as a renter; and <br /> as to non purchasing residents, complying with State law as to how rents are to be <br /> calculated, depending on the income level of the resident household. <br /> Here, the Park owner has sent out to each resident a Tenant Impact Report (TIR), a <br /> copy of which is attached as Attachment 11. The TIR (the terms of which were <br /> negotiated with City staff) provides that the sales of the lots /units will not occur for at <br /> least ten years, that the terms of the Rent Stabilization Agreement will remain in <br /> effect through at least 2017, that no one will be evicted upon conversion (ten years <br /> hence), that residents will have the option to purchase their lot/unit; and that rents, <br /> after conversion, will be in accordance with State law. Staff therefore recommends <br /> that this finding can also be made. <br /> Potential Additional Affordability Restrictions <br /> Staff observes that the conversion of the Park to residential ownership has both <br /> positives and negatives. The conversion would provide home ownership opportunities <br /> at an affordability level not found elsewhere in the City. Ownership would also provide <br /> more control over Park improvements to the residents. <br /> The primary disadvantage of the conversion would be the potential loss of long -term <br /> affordable rental opportunities in town. Secondly, those residents who do not choose to <br /> or are not able to purchase their space, and are not low income so that their rents would <br /> be controlled by State law, would be subject to increased rents to market rate over a <br /> five -year period. To offset these potential impacts to non -low- income renters, staff has <br /> requested that the Park owner consider extending similar affordability opportunities to <br /> this subset of Park residents. At the time this report was prepared, staff had not yet <br /> received a response to this request. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> The conversion of an existing rental mobile home park to a residential subdivision, <br /> cooperative, or condominium for mobile homes is statutorily exempt [California <br /> Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15282 (e)]. Therefore, no <br /> environmental documentation accompanies this report. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> There are clearly legal issues for which no definitive answer can be provided at this <br /> time. Some of these issues are subject to pending litigation in other jurisdictions, but it <br /> will take some time for these issues to be litigated to the point where there is appellate <br /> Page 5 of 6 <br />