Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Forbath continued that if a resident needed to go into assisted living, the property <br /> could be sold to pay off the loan, and the property would now include the home and the <br /> lot. She added that if the person passed away in five years, the piece of land would be <br /> an asset that would go to the heirs, who would have the choice to keep it or sell it. <br /> Commissioner Fox inquired what percentage of residents would be able to qualify for a <br /> $200,000 loan. <br /> Ms. Forbath replied that as long as the residents are low income, they would qualify for <br /> the State program; additionally, the park owner would assist those who do not qualify in <br /> obtaining a regular home loan by working with lenders and looking for available <br /> financing that is much better than what is in place today. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor inquired whether or not deferring principal and interest would <br /> make the loan actually higher than the value of the lot and home combined. <br /> Ms. Forbath replied that this does not typically occur as land values go up and there <br /> would be equity. She noted that the home or "coach" would depreciate, but the price of <br /> real estate increases. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor inquired if the State would extend a loan for both the mobile <br /> home and the land if an 85- year -old resident is making payments on the mobile home <br /> and purchases the land for $200,000. <br /> Ms. Forbath replied that the loan would only be on the land but that the existing mobile <br /> home loan would be considered in the assessment. <br /> Commissioner Fox noted that the survey was done for ten years into the future and <br /> inquired if this would be adequate or bona fide, considering that the price ten years from <br /> now would be unknown and seniors would have no idea what the values would be in the <br /> future. <br /> Ms. Forbath replied that there are several reasons for someone to support the <br /> conversion without knowing whether or not they want to buy, including the recognition <br /> that it provides options in the future. She noted that one would not necessarily have <br /> enough information until the DRE process is completed, and the applicants cannot go to <br /> that process until they are approved by the City. She added that the survey is not <br /> asking whether or not they want to buy but whether they support the idea of having an <br /> option in the future. <br /> Mr. Close stated that he raised similar points when the law was being proposed, but the <br /> legislature decided that the survey must be done in the beginning of the process. He <br /> indicated that he thinks the legislature wanted the park owner to get a feeling as to <br /> whether or not residents might be interested in purchasing if they were able to do it and <br /> if financing was available. He indicated that he agreed with some comments that the <br /> EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 25, 2009 Page 8 of 19 <br />