Laserfiche WebLink
Notwithstanding the residents' lack of support for the conversion, staff continues to <br /> recommend that the City Council approve the application. The Park owner, relying on <br /> case law and some legislative history, maintains that all the Map Act requires is for the <br /> owner to obtain a survey of support, not that the survey must demonstrate any particular <br /> level of support for the conversion. Although some public entities have argued that the <br /> purpose of the statute is to allow conversion only when there is significant support for <br /> the conversion, to date there is no case law to support that position. Moreover, even if <br /> state legislation were adopted that would set forth a threshold level of support <br /> necessary for conversion (or that would more clearly authorize cities and counties to <br /> adopt local laws so requiring), this applicant is proceeding under the Map Act as it <br /> existed in 2007 —with all its ambiguities and uncertainties —when the owner's <br /> application was complete. <br /> Due to these uncertainties if the application were denied, staff continues to recommend <br /> the City Council uphold the appeal and approve the application for the following <br /> reasons. First, for the next ten years, the Park will continue to operate as a rental <br /> mobile home Park, subject to the Rent Stabilization Agreement that is now in place. <br /> Second, after ten years, when the Park owner proceeds with the conversion and begins <br /> marketing lots, no then existing resident will be required to purchase his /her /their lot or <br /> be compelled to leave the Park. Those residents who do wish to purchase their lots will <br /> have that opportunity. For those who do not wish to purchase their lot, as indicated <br /> above, State law does provide reasonable rent control protection for those lower income <br /> residents. Those residents who are not lower income could see their rents raised but it <br /> would be over a five year period. Over time, of course, the conversion will result in the <br /> loss of 208 units of rental housing for seniors but may provide an opportunity for <br /> affordable, for sale, senior housing, currently in short supply in the City. <br /> In May Council took action to support legislation that would strengthen local control over <br /> mobile home conversions and to support other public entities' litigation efforts to <br /> exercise more local control over such conversions. Such legislation in now pending in <br /> the State legislature and staff hopes it becomes law. <br /> Assuming state law changes or case law is decided that will more expressly authorize <br /> cities and counties to impose a certain threshold of residential support before approving <br /> a conversion such as this, staff may recommend to the Council that such ordinances be <br /> adopted. At the moment, however, staff recommends the Council uphold the appeal. <br /> S Approv Dolan Michael Roush Nelson ialho <br /> Director of Community Development City Attorney City Manager <br /> Attachments <br /> 1. May 5, 2009 City Council Agenda Report <br /> 2. Supplemental Agenda Report <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br />