Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Sullivan expressed concern that, as the State requirements for renewable energy <br /> increases, more of these proposals will come forward. He asked staff to request an analysis of the <br /> current lines, the potential for expanding upon those, and the possibility of using existing routes to <br /> minimize impacts. He asked the record to reflect the need for better coordination of efforts. <br /> Councilmember Thorne said the issue of transporting renewable energy from the generation point <br /> to the point of use is a national issue. He concurred with Councilmember Sullivan that efforts need <br /> to focus on the most efficient, not least expensive, method for doing so. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan noted that the implementation of an AB811 District will ease that problem <br /> by keeping the energy source local. <br /> Vice -Mayor Cook- Kallio questioned if either a private utility like PG &E or a municipal district has any <br /> advantage over the other and if their level of cooperation is determined by a need for customers. <br /> She shared her concerns for the health issues surrounding this and cited 2 instances of juvenile <br /> leukemia that doctors attributed to a close proximity to transmission towers. <br /> Councilmember McGovern suggested that all area agencies meet together to discuss their <br /> concerns and collectively draft this letter. <br /> Mayor Hosterman suggested that the council wait until some feedback has been received. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan noted that there will not be any feedback until the EIR is finished and <br /> circulated. Mr. Fialho outlined the process, beginning with a letter from staff which captures the <br /> comments of the Council and is forwarded to the JPA. The JPA will then begin the EIR process and <br /> staff will have a second opportunity to comment when the draft EIR is circulated. He acknowledged <br /> Councilmember McGovern's point and explained that the 3 planning directors of Pleasanton, <br /> Livermore, and Alameda County have been working in concert with one another on this issue. They <br /> are coordinating their responses and planning to meet as a group in the future. <br /> Councilmember McGovern stressed the importance of maximizing every opportunity to protect the <br /> area's interests in this. <br /> BREAK: Mayor Hosterman called for a 4- minute break and thereafter reconvened the regular <br /> meeting. <br /> 17. Consideration of a Business Assistance Program to Support the Retention and Attraction of <br /> Local Businesses <br /> Economic Development Director Pamela Ott provided the staff report, stating that following the <br /> Council's discussion on economic development opportunities earlier this year, staff has met with <br /> representatives of the Pleasanton Downtown Association, Chamber of Commerce, and Economic <br /> Vitality Committee to discuss methods for collectively and individually supporting the business <br /> community. She noted that many of the proposed programs are aimed at the downtown area, <br /> stressed that businesses throughout the community are in need of this assistance and explained <br /> the downtown area will pilot many of the programs before they are applied to the broader <br /> community. <br /> The program focuses on marketing and promotion, retention and attraction, and development <br /> through the use of workshops, a market data study, promotional signage regulations, and shop <br /> local incentives; a downtown design loan assistance program, tenant improvement program, sales <br /> tax reimbursement program, and deferment or financing of development fees. Certain elements of <br /> the program such as the market data study and promotional signage adjustments can be <br /> City Council Minutes Page 9 of 11 June 2, 2009 <br />