Laserfiche WebLink
which are also discussed in the EIR; and (3) thorough descriptions of each impact and <br /> each associated mitigation measure can be obtained from the EIR. <br /> Transportation <br /> Impact TR -1 Increased motor vehicle traffic due to implementation of the proposed <br /> General Plan buildout would cause an increase in traffic at study <br /> intersections that would be substantial in relation to the existing traffic load <br /> and capacity of the street system. (Significant) <br /> Finding. The City finds that the following mitigation measures may conflict with other <br /> goals and policies of the proposed General Plan to encourage pedestrian <br /> mobility and maintain Pleasanton's community character or are infeasible <br /> and therefore these measures have not been incorporated into the <br /> proposed General Plan, thereby not mitigating the impacts to a less -than- <br /> significant level. A statement of overriding considerations for the impacts is <br /> made in the following section. <br /> Reconfigure Owens Drive at Hopyard Road to improve the traffic level of <br /> service by providing additional traffic lanes and by changing signal timings, <br /> per TR -1.1. <br /> DEIR, page 3.2 -21 <br /> Restripe and widen Stoneridge Drive at Johnson Drive by providing four <br /> westbound through lanes, per TR -1.2. <br /> FEIR, page 5 -7 <br /> Air Quality <br /> Impact AQ -1 Development due to buildout of the proposed General Plan would result in <br /> an increase in population lower than that estimated in the newest air quality <br /> plan (2005 Ozone Strategy) and an increase in vehicle miles traveled. This <br /> would lead to increases in air pollutants due to cumulative development in <br /> the Planning Area that could conflict with implementation of the current air <br /> quality plan. (Significant and Unavoidable) <br /> Finding. Development due to buildout of the proposed General Plan would result in <br /> an increase in population lower than that estimated in the newest air quality <br /> plan (2005 Ozone Strategy) and an increase in vehicle miles traveled and <br /> would lead to increases in air pollutants. This would have a significant effect <br /> due to cumulative development in the Planning Area that could conflict with <br /> implementation of the current air quality plan. The City finds that no <br /> mitigation measures are feasible and the impact would remain significant <br /> and unavoidable. A statement of overriding considerations for this impact is <br /> made in the following section. <br /> DEIR, p. 3.10 -8 <br /> Exhibit D 8 <br />