Laserfiche WebLink
R Robert Harris Associates <br /> LETTER 11 <br /> Caamum,u <br /> In Planar. <br /> Danlape n[ al <br /> Fondant CETVQ <br /> DEC 5 2008 <br /> Dxember 5, 2008 CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> PLANNING DIVISION <br /> Janice Stern, Principal Planner <br /> C ty of Pleasanton <br /> 200 OM Bernal Avenue <br /> Pleasanton, CA 94566 <br /> R General Plan Update and DEIR <br /> Diar Ms, Stern: <br /> The purpose of this letter is to comment on the Pleasanton General Plan Update and the <br /> Daft Environmental impact Report prepared for the Update. <br /> 1 represent Jennifer Lin owner of the 562 acre Oak Grove property located at the eastern <br /> terminus ofHearet Drive. In reviewing the Land Use Map of the General Plan Update <br /> v d Figure 2-3 of the DEIR, we noticed that the land use designations on the Oat Grove <br /> pn operty have been changed from the current General Plan On the laner Oak Grove is <br /> designated as 489 acme of Rural Density Residential and 73 acres of Public Health and <br /> Safety Open Space, The maps in both the Update and DEIR appear to have retained the <br /> T acres of Open Space but the designation of the remaining 489 acres of the property has <br /> In en significantly changed. It appear that, in harmony with the PUD (PUD -33) <br /> a; proved for Oak Grove, the General Plan has been changed to designate Rural Density <br /> R sidential in the area shown for development in the PUD, whik the area to be dedicated <br /> to the City is designated as Parks and Recreation. This means approximately 66 acres is 11 <br /> di:signsted Rural Density Residential in the Update and its DEM with the remainder of <br /> the 489 acres, or approximately 423 acres, designated Pads and Recreation. We note, <br /> also in conformance with PUD -33, the maps indicate Oak Grove may have a maximum <br /> of 51 units, <br /> %►bile we understand the City apparently wants to make the now General Plan better <br /> reflect the entitlement granted by PUD -33, we are not comfortable that the Land Use <br /> Map shows only 66 acres of Rural Density Residential on Oak Grove, even with the <br /> cr veat that up to 51 units could be bcated there. Our concern is that someone might <br /> q� hestion how 66 acres of Rural Density Residential, which allows no more than one <br /> dwelling unit per five acres, could be construed to accommodate 51 homes. Also, if for V <br /> 6 Crory Earle Ct. Plse.an an, CA. 94565 Phan 192Sy6469 Far (9251846 -1678 <br />