Laserfiche WebLink
7. Page 3.1 -12, LU -4 discusses conflicts and incompatibility between existing <br /> agricultural uses and proposed non agricultural land use- Are there any goals 6.8 <br /> within the General Plan besides those listed on page 3.1 -13 to maintain and keep <br /> agricultural lands within an Agricultural land use category within the city? <br /> 8. Currently the Merritt Property is designated as low density residential so does that <br /> mean it is no longer considered as farm land by the state? <br /> 9, To keep agricultural land within the city limits of Pleasanton, should we look at <br /> this land use more closely to identify other areas to keep as agricultural to keep the 6.9 <br /> diversity of land use in our city? <br /> 10. LU -5 discusses 90 acres of Williamson Act land to he in the City's existing limit <br /> line. Which property is this? <br /> 3.2 Transportation <br /> 11. Page 3.12 states that only fully funded projects identified in the Triangle Study <br /> have been included in the traffic model (discussed below in Methodology etc.) <br /> 'Ibis section does not occur until page 3.2 -10. This could be confining to residents <br /> that do not usually read this type of document. I have quickly reviewed this section <br /> and don't see a section that list the improvements that were fully funded- Could <br /> you please direct me to the section where 1 might find this listing? <br /> 12. Page 3.2 -8 discusses the RAPID route, It has been changed to establish a new <br /> route that goes to the Dublin side of the BART station. Should this be changed for <br /> the Final EIR or changed in the final General Man document? <br /> 13. Page3.2 -23, bullet 5, Program 1.7; Discusses if the General Plan is amended to <br /> include West Los Positas interchange with 1 -680 to allow referendum. It allows 30 <br /> days for signature gathering. First. this interchange is removed from the General <br /> Plan correct? This statement allows the citizens the opponunity to have a year to <br /> circulate an initiative, is that correct? <br /> L.ibers at end: <br /> EI3RP District <br /> 1. Did the General Man update and the EIR address any potential impacts to existing <br /> and planned regional park and trail facilities and is it consistent with the District's <br /> 1997 Master Plan? <br /> B;iy Arca Quality \lanagcmcnt District <br /> 2, Did this DEIR address all the issues discussed in this letter? If not, what was not <br /> addressed and why? <br /> A arneda County Congestion Management Agency <br /> 3. Did the DEIR address all the issues discussed in this letter? If not. what was not <br /> addressed and why? <br /> 3 <br />